Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Both, yes. I've argued Smaller is Better, but only for exploratory
research. Once you have something that you can reproduce, then making
it bigger and stronger becomes the new goal. You *start* with the
small system and explore the hell out of it, you don't just
Blush.
Some corrections to my overly hasty post below:
I misread the table I found for heat transfer coefficients at
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/overall-heat-transfer-coefficients-d_284.html.
It turns out heat transfer coefficients are not so easy to predict, but
(consistent with
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Can Rossi generate steam hotter
than 110 °C ?
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:43 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Let me add my two cents
In other words, you've got nothin' but vague, unsupported insults.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:59 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Joshua,
You are free to express your opinion on the Rossi's e-Cat matter, and you
certainly have done that in more than one
From Joshua:
In other words, you've got nothin' but vague,
unsupported insults.
In my view, it doesn't matter if my vague unsupported insults (which I
freely admit were done at your expense) are correct or not.
You seem to believe that you have Rossi's occasionally troubling heat
measurements
From Joshua:
...
Eventually, in a few years Rossi will simply fade away
like Patterson from the 90s, and the CF community will
make excuses like his stock of lucky catalyst ran out
and he found he was unable to make more, and you will
refuse to admit you were wrong.
Thank you for sharing
In an earlier post svj wrote:
As best as I can tell, you appear to be transfixed at ground zero,
seemingly
acting as the last remaining sane skeptic in this sorry gullible world, the
one last intelligent, logical, rational, person left who knows better, who
knows he is absolutely certain Rossi's
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Mon, 9 May 2011 23:19:05 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
What makes that private experiment even harder to take seriously is the
claimed 130 kW excursion. Rossi has on occasion mentioned an optimum
operating temperature of about 400C. If this temperature provides the usual
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:12 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This is based on the assumption that the actual operating temperature is
indeed
400C @ 15 kW. If it's in fact much less, then 130 kW for a short period may
not
be a problem. Perhaps it only gets up to 400C when the output is really
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:43 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me add my two cents:
Sorry, it's not worth even that.
(I've stayed away from this list because its terms of reference clearly
exclude people of my mindset, but this discussion of higher
10 matches
Mail list logo
