[Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread Michele Comitini
From JONP at http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=11#comment-168774 HanzJager January 12th, 2012 at 12:54 PM Thank you for all of your hard work and dedication to this Mr. Rossi! I can’t wait to have an eCat sitting in my basement! Have you seen this video released by NASA?

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote: Andrea Rossi January 12th, 2012 at 5:42 PM Dear Hanz Jager: The fact that NASA is trying to copy my work honours me. But their theory is wrong. We will beat them, as well as all the other Competitors with

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread mixent
In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800: Hi, [snip] If NASA's theory is wrong, how are they any form of competition? This doesn't compute. It does if they use the same method and get similar results, even with the wrong theory. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800: Hi, [snip] If NASA's theory is wrong, how are they any form of competition? This doesn't compute. It does if they use the same method and get similar results,

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread Michele Comitini
A bee can fly. An eagle can fly. Different animals, different evolutionary paths. Both don't give a bit to theory of flight, still they fly. mic 2012/1/13 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to  Mary Yugo's message of Fri,

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread francis
Michele, a bumblebee might be a better example since it defies the laws of aerodynamics and it must therefore be a figment of our imagination and really can't fly from this sort of skeptical perspective. We don't have to accept anyone's theory when the experimental results are proven. Even if the

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread mixent
In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:42:59 -0800: Hi, [snip] On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800: Hi, [snip] If NASA's theory is wrong, how are they any form of competition? This

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

2012-01-13 Thread Peter Gluck
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:33 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:42:59 -0800: Hi, [snip] On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800: Hi, [snip] If

[Vo]:Rossi on NASA

2011-07-15 Thread Alan J Fletcher
Martin July 14th, 2011 at 1:57 PM Dear mr Rossi, Today there was a meeting with NASA about your invention. Is it possible to give some information about this meeting? If it is not possible no problem! Im just very curious. Best regards Martin Andrea Rossi July 15th, 2011 at 7:24 AM Dear

Re: [Vo]:Rossi on NASA

2011-07-15 Thread Terry Blanton
I suppose they know the secret sauce? T

Re: [Vo]:Rossi on NASA

2011-07-15 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Alan, please let me know what's the source (url) of this info; it is not in his 1072 answers at his website. And there are other places where Rossi speaks? Thanks! Peter On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Martin July 14th, 2011 at 1:57