Must be a fresh batch of windowpane circulating in Berkeley.
Haven't heard that word in decades.
Far out.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
Subject: [Vo]:Spin Coupling
Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2014 8:21 AM
Must be a fresh batch of windowpane circulating in Berkeley.
Haven't heard that word in decades.
Far out.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
It's so hard to combine science with humor in a way that no one is sure... even
when it is acid humor g
BTW - the word “humor” comes from the Greek for wet. Humor must have
originally served to dilute the hard realities of the bronze age. These daze,
science humor is often served without
Spin coupling is a superset phrase for several types of energy transfer
mechanisms, including angular momentum coupling, magnetic coupling and much
more. Unfortunately, there is no scholarly paper to elucidate all of the
intricacy of this phenomenon, as it applies to LENR. Mention was made of
spin
.
How's that for a guess?
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 12:17 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Spin Coupling
Spin coupling is a superset phrase for several types of energy transfer
mechanisms, including
I have recently come across Torsion Fields, the theoretical fifth force
that has yet to be experimentally demonstrated.
Should this fifth force be the 10th spin-spin interaction on the list?
Nigel
On 07/09/2014 20:17, Jones Beene wrote:
Spin coupling is a superset phrase for several types of
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I do not know about Heffner or Springer, but more power to them.
Horace's web page is still up. I hope the same is true for him.
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
I have recently come across Torsion Fields, the theoretical fifth force that
has yet to be experimentally demonstrated.
Should this fifth force be the 10th spin-spin interaction on the list?
The web has much on the works of
Wiki doesn't have many kind words for many of the torsion field proponents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_field_%28pseudoscience%29
...despite Jack Sarfatti (or maybe because of him)
But there could be a kernel of truth which is related to spin coupling. Terry
may know what Jack's
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Wiki doesn't have many kind words for many of the torsion field proponents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_field_%28pseudoscience%29
...despite Jack Sarfatti (or maybe because of him)
But there could be a kernel of
Wikipedia may not have kind words for the proponents, but that does not
seem to have stopped other people making serious (I assume) suggestions
as to how they could be measured, and getting their ideas published in
Science.
Here is one of Shipov's definitive papers if anyone wishes to make up
their own mind:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBM1FaZDBoUWVnNEE/edit?usp=sharing
Robert Dicke to the rescue:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brans%E2%80%93Dicke_theory
This guy deserved two Nobel prizes... but who sez life is fair?
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Dyer
Wikipedia may not have kind words for the proponents, but that does not
seem to have stopped other
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
The presence of a magnetic field is known to separate the energy states
associated with spin energy. The variation of magnetic fields may allow the
random connection with resonant frequencies and spin quantum states in a
matrix of Ni ...
It would seem
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
It would seem that spin coupling is pushing us towards a better model of
LENR. If we can agree that mass is being converted into energy and
transferred by way of spin coupling as the active modality, then the next
question
Speaking of mysticism, Bob - here is a poser that only a greek-geek
freemason vortician on the RAW tradition, will appreciate:
Nickel has 28 written all through it. Is there a deeper, even Platonic,
understanding for why 28 is magical in the nuclear context?
Must be a fresh batch of windowpane circulating in Berkeley.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S8_O2_Cook.pdf
If you have nothing better to do this weekend, here is a 71 page paper
which Rossi says gives a correct explanation of gain with Ni-H. I do not
have the
http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S8_O2_Cook.pdf
If you have nothing better to do this weekend, here is a 71 page paper which
Rossi says gives a correct explanation of gain with Ni-H. I do not have the
time, so the hope is to entice someone else to chop wood (Van Morrison fans
If there is a real DDL species in LENR (hydrogen isomer with electron
orbital at less than 10 Fermi), even if it is a transitory species with a
lifetime of only nanoseconds, then there is a way for nickel to provide the
thermal gain, by spin coupling with no fusion required. In fact, if there is
Jones--
I would bet that Pd lattice can also provide high magnetic fields and spin
coupling as you have indicated for Ni-62.
It may not be as effective however.
Eric--take note of Jones assessment of spin coupling and the importance of
magnetic fields.
What causes the latency you outline
John, I’m quite familiar with what Meulenberg has written over the years on
the DDL but it is not his invention. He deserves lots of credit for
promoting it, however.
Nor is the DDL really attributable to Mills. In fact, RM can be faulted for
not acknowledging the previous work. Mills does add
LENR reactions with nickel is a very rare minority reaction. The primary
reaction is in the extraction of nuclear energy from hydrogen crystals
(Rydberg matter).
A NiH reactor can operates for months and years without much deterioration
of the nickel nano-structures through transmutation. The NiH
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
8) It is not clear if the Ni-62 gives up some of its own mass, or is
a
gateway to the Dirac sea ... Either way, this is LENR but it is also
non-fusion LENR
Well, I'm working on my own pet theory but can't find the
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Well, I'm working on my own pet theory but can't find the information to
support it. I think the Rossi effect works by conversion of electrons
directly into energy. Crazy, huh?
Not really crazy - Rossi/Focardi's old comments relates to
The is about a half-dozen indicators that LENR is dark matter, and there is
a good chance that this dark matter is producing the dark energy that is
expanding the universe.
I am dishartend that my posts on this dark issue are not convincing, but
recupitualtion is my game
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014
I BELIEVE YOU. I think this place is crawling with it, especially over
our heads, uncurling in the atmosphere, bending and lensing and
attenuating light and Doppler microwave radiation and RF. Space is
all puckered up. We are creatures of the quantum vacuum.
Stewart
darkmattersalot.com
On Fri,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The way to convert electrons to energy is via positrons (anti-electrons).
However, that radiation signature shows up quite well with meters, and it is
probably why in 2011, Bianchini who was hired to look for a radiation
28 matches
Mail list logo
