On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable.
They result from human effort and they are useful whether are not
deemed to be objectively true.
A patented natural law would not prevent people from
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable.
What do you think about patenting human tissue without compensating
Am 25.11.2011 18:57, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM,peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable.
They result from human effort and they are useful whether are not
deemed to be objectively true.
A patented
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Harry Veeder
hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think about patenting human tissue without
compensating the former owner? For example HeLa cells?
I don't know anything
By the way, the U.S.P.O. jargon for this is a force of nature. You cannot
patent a force of nature, meaning a newly discovered law of physics or
physical effect, such as the Seebeck effect, Peltier effect and Thomson
effect. In other words, Seebeck, Peltier and Thomson would not be allowed
to
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 25.11.2011 18:57, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:50 AM,peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Natural laws cannot been patented.
I think natural laws should be patentable.
They result from human
I would argue that the law of nature known as the conservation of
momentum is a specific implementation of the force of nature known
as the property of inertia.
Of course, since the law of CoM has been in the public domain since
the 19th century, it would not be patentable today. The question is
I meant since the 18th century or even earlier.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, since the law of CoM has been in the public domain since
the 19th century, it would not be patentable today. The question is
really about future laws.
Harry
I wrote:
The natural laws form a map of the universe. The map is not the
territory, so just as owning a map is not the same thing as owning the
terrority, owning the natural laws does not mean you own the whole
universe.
humm ... the grand narrative for interpreting natural law was
10 matches
Mail list logo