Hi Vortex People!
Thanks to everyone that loaned me a piece of their brain.
I'm in complete overload. Where to start?
On manifolds in spaces: My last more-smarter question: Is
higher-manifold physics theory, encompassing measured anomalies in the
3D +time space, by using the math like
Awesome links! Thanks Bill!
-Don
On 3/20/2021 6:06 AM, William Beaty wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
In the far field the toroidal field components can be
(most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal
fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
In the far field the toroidal field components can be
(most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal
fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But just google some terms I gave.
The Corum bros wrote the following in 2008,
Note that in this month's Analog SF magazine, there's a nice little
FE-device inventor story, "Damocles," S. McMullen, where a WW1 death-ray
invention ends up just where such inventions would end up, if actually
successful.
March https://www.analogsf.com/current-issue/table-of-contents/
It is referred to as 5th density; not 5th dimension. Torsion, (or toroidal,)
fields were actually expounded upon by Russian scientist, (Shipov, Heim,
Kozarev, etc.) who did EXTENSIVE research and experimentation on torsion
fields. This throws string theory out the window and explains the
Kaluza-Klein has been started by Einstein too but it/he failed due to
misunderstanding the nature of time in mass.
As in GR where S^3 is the solution topology he did go to S^4 the other
failure in thinking as a simply connected surface cannot carry/ be
smoothly covered by flux due to
Interesting references. It reminded me of something I recalled from one of
my EM classes many years ago where the professor injected that adding a 5th
Dimension allowed for the unification of EM and Gravity and the basis for a
theory of everything. Later learning that it was Kaluza-Klien theory
The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape their
mind or what they are able to see.
The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher dimension than 4.
As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S^3 :
https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf.
Cosmic strings in a garage-lab?
The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed ring-defects or
"smoke rings." They appear in fluids, but not in fluid-analogy for EM
fields. Some amperes trapped in a superconducting ring are similar, but
b-fields are not EM Torsion. Hugo
*A Help-Wanted posting to the Vortex People (hosted by William J. Beaty)
*
By DonEMitchell, wannabe mathematician
*Tutor wanted: *An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what
topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and
provide contemporary speak for me to
10 matches
Mail list logo
