Robert Leguillon wrote:
/snip/
Heffner is saying that since the flow rate may not be 60 L in 4 hours it
might be zero. That is preposterous.
/snip/
Because the flow rate was not at its max (it was sped up during quenching) and
it decreases with back pressure (as demonstrated in the September
Maybe I'd overlooked this, when did they measure and film the outpouring water?
I thought that it was twice during the entire demo - once while it was running,
and once during quenching, no?
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Leguillon wrote:
/snip/
Heffner is saying that
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'd overlooked this, when did they measure and film the outpouring
water?
Yes, many people saw the water and bubbles moving through the hose.
FURTHERMORE, we know with certainty that there was steam or hot water
coming out of the
I wrote:
Something had to be coming out of the reactor the entire time. It had to be
coming out at a flow rate large enough to deliver lots of heat to those
thermocouples.
We also know from Lewan's log that he measured the flow rate at the time
when the flow rate was lowest. He measured 0.9
4 matches
Mail list logo
