Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-06 Thread Peter Gluck
Sometimes we are not able to co-process many contradictory statements. Also the process used in 2016 can be significantly different- for example regarding the radioactive channels open or shot- from what he used in 2011-2. A really complex issue-changing. Peter On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:45 AM,

Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-05 Thread Axil Axil
Yes, this is a mistruth. On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck > wrote: > > do not take this literally >> >> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today >> >> >>

Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-05 Thread Eric Walker
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: do not take this literally > > I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html > Quoted from your blog post: Andrea

Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-05 Thread Craig Haynie
The number is a little too perfect, don't you think? 8,400,000 kwh / 350 days / 24 hours/day = exactly 1.000 mw of power output. Craig On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 19:57 +0200, Peter Gluck wrote: > > > do not take this literally > > > I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today > >

[Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-04 Thread Peter Gluck
do not take this literally I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com