Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-06 Thread Peter Gluck
Sometimes we are not able to co-process many contradictory statements.
Also the process used in 2016 can be significantly different- for example
regarding the radioactive channels open or shot- from what he used in
2011-2.
A really complex issue-changing.

Peter

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Eric Walker  wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck 
> wrote:
>
> do not take this literally
>>
>> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
>>
>>
>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html
>>
>
> Quoted from your blog post:
>
> Andrea Rossi
> March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM
>
> Gerard McEk:
> The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the
> background have ever been measured in 6 years.
> The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for
> excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete
> list of analysis and scopies.
> Warm Regards,
> A.R.
>
>
> Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead
> shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize
> "gammas".
>
> Eric
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-05 Thread Axil Axil
Yes, this is a mistruth.

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Eric Walker  wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck 
> wrote:
>
> do not take this literally
>>
>> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
>>
>>
>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html
>>
>
> Quoted from your blog post:
>
> Andrea Rossi
> March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM
>
> Gerard McEk:
> The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the
> background have ever been measured in 6 years.
> The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for
> excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete
> list of analysis and scopies.
> Warm Regards,
> A.R.
>
>
> Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead
> shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize
> "gammas".
>
> Eric
>
>


Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-05 Thread Eric Walker
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck  wrote:

do not take this literally
>
> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
>
>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html
>

Quoted from your blog post:

Andrea Rossi
March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM

Gerard McEk:
The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the
background have ever been measured in 6 years.
The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for
excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete
list of analysis and scopies.
Warm Regards,
A.R.


Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead
shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize
"gammas".

Eric


Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-05 Thread Craig Haynie
The number is a little too perfect, don't you think?

8,400,000 kwh / 350 days / 24 hours/day = exactly 1.000 mw of power
output.

Craig


On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 19:57 +0200, Peter Gluck wrote:
> 
> 
> do not take this literally
> 
> 
> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
> 
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




[Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

2016-03-04 Thread Peter Gluck
do not take this literally

I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com