Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR
Sometimes we are not able to co-process many contradictory statements. Also the process used in 2016 can be significantly different- for example regarding the radioactive channels open or shot- from what he used in 2011-2. A really complex issue-changing. Peter On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Eric Walkerwrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck > wrote: > > do not take this literally >> >> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html >> > > Quoted from your blog post: > > Andrea Rossi > March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM > > Gerard McEk: > The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the > background have ever been measured in 6 years. > The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for > excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete > list of analysis and scopies. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead > shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize > "gammas". > > Eric > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR
Yes, this is a mistruth. On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Eric Walkerwrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck > wrote: > > do not take this literally >> >> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html >> > > Quoted from your blog post: > > Andrea Rossi > March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM > > Gerard McEk: > The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the > background have ever been measured in 6 years. > The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for > excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete > list of analysis and scopies. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead > shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize > "gammas". > > Eric > >
Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluckwrote: do not take this literally > > I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html > Quoted from your blog post: Andrea Rossi March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM Gerard McEk: The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the background have ever been measured in 6 years. The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete list of analysis and scopies. Warm Regards, A.R. Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize "gammas". Eric
Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR
The number is a little too perfect, don't you think? 8,400,000 kwh / 350 days / 24 hours/day = exactly 1.000 mw of power output. Craig On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 19:57 +0200, Peter Gluck wrote: > > > do not take this literally > > > I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR
do not take this literally I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com