Re: [Vo]:anti-matter production

[H LV]

This is off topic but I have speculated that the eye creates a very small
amount of light so it might be place where spontaneous hawking radiation
occurs.
Harry

On Sat., Aug. 24, 2019, 8:49 p.m. Axil Axil,  wrote:

> Rossi said that the SL reactor produces photons in the 100 to 200 nm
> range. This is the photon energy that resolves when Hawking's radiation is
> extracted from the vacuum. Those photons have negative frequency.
>
> As I have repeated a few time: SK energy does not come from transmutation
> but from Hawking radiation. Rossi has found how to minimize transmutation
> and produce energy by extracting photons from the vacuum. Photons extracted
> from the vacuum have negative frequency. This means that they are in the UV
> or EUV energy frequency range.
>
>
> See:
>
> Testing Hawking radiation in laboratory black hole analogues
>
> https://phys.org/news/2019-...
> 
>
> In their study, Leonhardt and his colleagues made light out of positive
> and negative frequencies. Their positive-frequency light was infrared,
> while the *negative-frequency one was ultraviolet*. The researchers
> detected both of them and then compared them with Hawking's theory.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:09 PM  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Rossi seems to think the Compton wavelength of the electron is important,
>> and
>> Proton21 uses 600 keV electrons.
>> Perhaps 511 keV is the minimal energy needed by an electron to convert a
>> proton
>> into an anti-proton (pair -production??).
>>
>> If so then the theoretical maximum energy gain per reaction is a factor
>> of
>> 2 x (mass of proton) / (mass of electron) = 3672.
>>
>> That ought to be enough to cover conversion inefficiencies. ;)
>>
>> It also has the great advantage that a star ship wouldn't need to carry
>> around
>> massive amounts of dangerous anti-matter, but rather could make what they
>> need
>> on-the-fly from ordinary matter. In fact they may even be able to harvest
>> hydrogen from interstellar space to use as fuel, ensuring that the
>> initial fuel
>> load would only need to be sufficient to get them up to a speed where
>> they can
>> collect it as fast as they use it.
>>
>> Combine this with a reactionless drive, and one has a near light speed
>> capability to reach the stars. :)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>
>> local asymmetry = temporary success
>>
>>

Re: [Vo]:anti-matter production

[Axil Axil]

Rossi said that the SL reactor produces photons in the 100 to 200 nm range.
This is the photon energy that resolves when Hawking's radiation is
extracted from the vacuum. Those photons have negative frequency.

As I have repeated a few time: SK energy does not come from transmutation
but from Hawking radiation. Rossi has found how to minimize transmutation
and produce energy by extracting photons from the vacuum. Photons extracted
from the vacuum have negative frequency. This means that they are in the UV
or EUV energy frequency range.


See:

Testing Hawking radiation in laboratory black hole analogues

https://phys.org/news/2019-...


In their study, Leonhardt and his colleagues made light out of positive and
negative frequencies. Their positive-frequency light was infrared, while
the *negative-frequency one was ultraviolet*. The researchers detected both
of them and then compared them with Hawking's theory.




On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:09 PM  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Rossi seems to think the Compton wavelength of the electron is important,
> and
> Proton21 uses 600 keV electrons.
> Perhaps 511 keV is the minimal energy needed by an electron to convert a
> proton
> into an anti-proton (pair -production??).
>
> If so then the theoretical maximum energy gain per reaction is a factor of
> 2 x (mass of proton) / (mass of electron) = 3672.
>
> That ought to be enough to cover conversion inefficiencies. ;)
>
> It also has the great advantage that a star ship wouldn't need to carry
> around
> massive amounts of dangerous anti-matter, but rather could make what they
> need
> on-the-fly from ordinary matter. In fact they may even be able to harvest
> hydrogen from interstellar space to use as fuel, ensuring that the initial
> fuel
> load would only need to be sufficient to get them up to a speed where they
> can
> collect it as fast as they use it.
>
> Combine this with a reactionless drive, and one has a near light speed
> capability to reach the stars. :)
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> local asymmetry = temporary success
>
>

[Vo]:anti-matter production

[mixent]

Hi,

Rossi seems to think the Compton wavelength of the electron is important, and
Proton21 uses 600 keV electrons.
Perhaps 511 keV is the minimal energy needed by an electron to convert a proton
into an anti-proton (pair -production??).

If so then the theoretical maximum energy gain per reaction is a factor of 
2 x (mass of proton) / (mass of electron) = 3672.

That ought to be enough to cover conversion inefficiencies. ;)

It also has the great advantage that a star ship wouldn't need to carry around
massive amounts of dangerous anti-matter, but rather could make what they need
on-the-fly from ordinary matter. In fact they may even be able to harvest
hydrogen from interstellar space to use as fuel, ensuring that the initial fuel
load would only need to be sufficient to get them up to a speed where they can
collect it as fast as they use it. 

Combine this with a reactionless drive, and one has a near light speed
capability to reach the stars. :)

Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success