-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
I suspect there is something important missing from this account.
What prompted Moller to look at Langmuir's work in the firstplace?
The impetus was that Moller, who is Danish, found and read private letters
from Bohr (the great Dane)
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
I suspect there is something important missing from this account.
What prompted Moller to look at Langmuir's work in the firstplace?
The impetus was that
wow today i find a website that was totally mind blowing.
this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic Hydrogen
Generator based on Irving Langmuir discovery. (nobel prize winner in
chemistry 1932) replicator don't called this cold fusion or lenr
device but you can see this device
One hour tests with a COP of 21
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/mahg/tests/mahg2c.htm
Full tests
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/mahg/tests/index.htm
On 12/16/12, David ledin mathematic.analy...@gmail.com wrote:
wow today i find a website that was totally mind blowing.
this website is about replication
Original Message-
From: David ledin
wow today i find a website that was totally mind blowing.
this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic Hydrogen
Generator based on Irving Langmuir discovery JL Naudin replicator
achieved COP of 21 with this device (power input of
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:13 AM, David ledin
mathematic.analy...@gmail.com wrote:
this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic Hydrogen
Generator based on Irving Langmuir discovery.
Although your premise regarding JLN has been explained here as Jones said:
Another has written about problems with the
Naudin replication. I haven't checked that out,
but, yes, if you believe everything you read on
the Internet, and don't check it, your mind can
be blown. Rather easily, since it's held
together with chewing gum and a bit of duct tape.
Seriously, I
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
Very silly error by Naudin (discovered up by George Holz on the MAGH forum)
in that JLN was using a 5% duty cycle and calculated the gain by reducing
the input readings - instead of measuring them directly.
Naudin's error was a multiple of 20
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem.
An inability to admit personal error is fatal for anyone involved
with scientific investigation. A real scientist, discovering a
significant error in published work, will *immediately*
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem.
Jones
I see that Sterling Allen's page on the MHG project by Naudin never
benefited from an explanation of the input power error. It's got some
enthusiastic posts from you. Maybe you'd
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem.
Jones
I see that Sterling Allen's page on the MHG project by Naudin never
benefited from an explanation
11 matches
Mail list logo
