I received this message a few minutes ago. Take it FWIW.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Something more on the steam
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:21:54 -0400
From: LEGUILLON Robert <robert.leguil...@us.thalesgroup.com>
To: sa...@pobox.com <sa...@pobox.com>
Stephen,
I'm not a member of the Vortex forum, but I've cracked the "steam
enthalpy" question, if you wouldn't mind posting (I already tossed it on
New Energy Times):
1. Misunderstandings and Defensive Behaviors Hurt Everyone... A Little
Research Helps
In Kullander's own report "Report by Hanno Essen and Sven Kullander on
Focardi and Rossi ECat (Cold Fusion", they say that "The system to
measure the non-evaporated water was a certified Testo System, Testo
650, with a probe guaranteed to resist up to 550°C. The measurements
showed that at 11:15 1.4% of the water was non-vaporized, at 11:30 1.3%
and at 11:45 1.2% of the water was non-vaporized. "
The Testo 650 probe is capable of displaying Relative Humidity (%RH),
Absolute Humidity (g/m3), degree of humidity (g/kg) and enthalpy (kcal/kg).
If they had read a percentage off of the Testo 650, without further
calculations, they were reading Relative Humidity, which is indeed a
measurement of mass, albeit a convoluted one
Relative Humidity = [(actual vapor density in g/m3)/(saturation vapor
density in g/m3)]x100%
So the quick answer is Rossi and Levi were right, and Krivit was right
to ask, and EVERYONE was wrong.
Ref:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2733806/posts
http://www.testo.com/online/embedded/Sites/INT/SharedDocuments/ProductBrochures/0563_6501_en_01.pdf;jsessionid=963FCCEDC864E54B23F0F3D7D70BA86C
Best,
R. Leguillon
