Re: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-19 Thread Bastiaan Bergman
I did the same, using a water cooker, and got about 90% efficiency assuming textbook heat to vaporize water. I am a little worried though, about: 1) The, to my feeling, rather slow rate of vapor/steam escaping Rossi's hose as seen in Krivits video My water cooker is 1.5kW, Rossi's water cooker is

RE: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Mark Iverson
jed, I got the post and the picture... -Mark _ From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 12:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible? I posted a message titled Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples with an

Re: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Peter Gluck
It is perfectly visible. But let's measure the enthalpy of the steam not any other characteristic Peter On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I posted a message titled Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples with an itty-bitty 17 kilobyte photo attached.

Re: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Peter Gluck wrote: It is perfectly visible. But let's measure the enthalpy of the steam not any other characteristic I am calibrating thermocouples. Is that not allowed? More calibrations and more specific information about temperatures, duration, the mass of metal and the mass of cooling