GJB:

If your hypothesis started with some (peer-reviewed, or not) references, could 
you please provide some links or abstracts on those?

-Mark

 

From: GJB [mailto:kiw...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 3:16 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:RFC: Localised Electrodynamic Lattice reaction hypothesis

 

 

Hi All,

 

I'd just like to put this hypothesis out there to get some feedback and see 
where the major flaws are:

 

- Small spheres with dielectric-metal interfaces only support surface plasmon 
polaritons with the spherical harmonic waves of the l=1 mode (the lowest), 
implying that normal component of field enhancement effect occurs purely at the 
two poles (North and South). So only two reaction sites per sphere but very 
intense field enhancements happen there, with the whole energy of the wave 
being concentrated temporarily at only these two sites. Some estimates put the 
field strengths at such sites at around 10^11 V/m

 

- The free electron density wave normal field component penetrates ~10 nm into 
the metal but ~100nm into the dielectric, i.e. v. high normal accelerations at 
reaction sites


- Potential dynamic voltages normal to the metal surface generated could then 
be of the order 10 kV

- Free protons that occur near the surface at reaction sites will also be 
accelerated by the enhanced surface plasmon polariton normal components, i.e. 
on the rebound the protons will be accelerated and have large velocity 
components perpendicular into the metal at the local reaction sites

 

- The surface plasmons have frequencies of order 10^14-10^15 Hz so the normal 
acceleration of protons away from and into the metal is taking place a high 
number of times per second, i.e. even low probability fusion events become 
likely in short (human) time scales.


- The number of these reaction sites are directly proportional to the number of 
spheres (or pointed pyramids, etc) in a reactor

- The driving mechanisms that excite the surface plasmon resonances could be 
electrons from currents (having drift velocity) in electrolytic cells or 
infrared radiation in thermally driven cells (this is a weak area since surface 
plasmon polaritons will require specific frequencies of radiation for 
excitation)

It is like a Inertial Electrostatic Confinement fusion model in some respects, 
but it is electrodynamic/lattice in essence since it uses the field of the free 
electron coherent surface plasmon waves to accelerate normally the protons, and 
the lattice to confine the nucleons of the metal targets. 

 

So call it Localised Electrodynamic Lattice fusion. 

Worth pursuing?

kiwigjb

Reply via email to