Vorts,

Have any in this group kept tabs on the work being performed by the inventor, 
Chris Arnold, specifically his Pulsed Plasma technology?

Check out: http://hometown.aol.com/hypercom59/

A little history (as I understand it): I recall there had been some scathing 
criticism of Mr. Arnold's work at the hydrino discussion group a few years ago 
- by the usual skeptics. As usual, nothing ever came of the discussion. 
Personally, I'm not sure Mr. Arnold is a quack. He appears to be slowly 
accumulating evidence from labs (perhaps some of them might even be considered 
reputable labs!) that appear to back up his claims.

Chris claims to be producing hybrid doped Hydrogenated Diamond Like Carbon 
(HDLC) particles rather than the well known HDLC films. 

He claims to have produced Synthetic Diamond nono-particles.

Lawrence Livermore tested Chris's Bucky Diamonds and discovered them to be a 
semiconductor whereby enforcing his original deduction that his material should 
be a Diamond Semiconductor.

Chris claims the only known method of Bucky Diamond manufacture is with TNT and 
detonation technology. His patented device produces what is looking like Bucky 
Diamond by purely electronic means in a process known as Dense Plasma Focus.

Of particular interest to Vorts: In the past Chris hinted that his "pulsed 
plasma technology" indicated the possibility of OU at work. However, such OU 
claims seem to have been removed. Perhaps Chris is focusing on the 
commercialization of his Bucky Diamond process which may turn out to be 
significantly cheaper than current means. It would make sense to me that a 
present he might not care to draw additional controversy. Such claims might 
turn out to be more of a distraction than a benefit to his current business 
plans.

I must confess. Much of what Chris claims to be doing is beyond my educational 
grasp to pass judgment one way or other.

How'bout comments from the peanut gallery?

Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com

Reply via email to