[Vo]:ANPA

2016-08-28 Thread ROGER ANDERTON
if anyone is interested, this group has relaunched itself on the Internet ANPA (Alternative Natural Philosophy Association) Conference 2016 has now finished Next year Conference 2017 is provisionally planned for: Monday 7th – Friday 11th August 2017 preferred, possibly 1 week earlier. at:

[Vo]:vision of LENR inspired by image of Mother Nature

2016-08-28 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-28-2016-vision-of-lenr-mirrors.html A good coming week to you all! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
a.ashfield wrote: > I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant > that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat. The > weight of evidence suggests that he has. > The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced

[Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread a.ashfield
Reviewing Lewan's piece, with the videos by the Greenyer, linked below, he makes a good case for process being basically the swap of a nickel's electron by a hydrogen ion. https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/03/07/finally-this-is-possibly-how-the-e-cat-works/ It seems to me this is a good

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread Lennart Thornros
Jed, Nobody has proven anything and you jump to conclusions. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread Axil Axil
How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > >> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant >> that Rossi was a

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil wrote: How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? > How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification? We go through this again. Eric

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread Axil Axil
True, the IH/Rossi contrace is contingent upon te certification of the customer. It would be stupid to misrepresent this certication, but anything is possible if improbable. Such misrepresentation is a criminal offence. *How much are the fines for violating these regulations?* The fines for

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

2016-08-28 Thread Eric Walker
There appears to be no OFAC certification in this instance. There's Henry Johnson's warranty that JM Chemicals is in compliance with OFAC (p. 25 of the complaint). There's no reason to think that JMC was in violation of OFAC by trading with an enemy of the US. Presumably what fraud there is