RE: [Vo]:Neutrons produced by sonication of metal

2016-10-11 Thread Russ George
recipes. As for Wiki surely there can be no debate over its litany of sins earning it a well-deserved splash of sauce. From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Neutrons produced by sonication of metal

RE: [Vo]:Neutrons produced by sonication of metal

2016-10-11 Thread Jones Beene
Yes, Taleyarkhan was wronged, and the most unfair thing about that entire situation is that Wiki perpetuates the error and has not corrected their entry. . but that has little to do with the Italian claims. From: Russ George Well since Taleyarkhan was found innocent and truthful

RE: [Vo]:Neutrons produced by sonication of metal

2016-10-11 Thread Russ George
] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 3:16 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Neutrons produced by sonication of metal There are several papers by Cardone which we discussed here about 5 years ago which are similar . on the subject of "Piezonuclear neutrons" from the fracturin

RE: [Vo]:Neutrons produced by sonication of metal

2016-10-11 Thread Jones Beene
There are several papers by Cardone which we discussed here about 5 years ago which are similar . on the subject of "Piezonuclear neutrons" from the fracturing of stone and other solids. The Italian physics establishment have been accusing Cardone and Carpinteri of incompetency and academic