Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

By "our" last experiments I mean you and I. The idea was mostly yours if I recall correctly. I don't have the site up anymore, but you can see it here: http://web.archive.org/web/20180613041630/http://lenr-coldfusion.com/ On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:45 PM Jones Beene wrote: > Jack Cole wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

Jack Cole wrote: It is also hard to not see some parallels with our last experiments (2016) with TiH2, nickel sheets, and light.  Jack Do you have an online citation for this work?

RE: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

Jones— One additional note: In my terminology x-rays originate from atomic electronic structure and gamma ray originate from isotope energy transitions. Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 12:29 PM To:

RE: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

Jones— Peter’s ideas are not much different tan t mine. He looked for inner electrons of various atoms and their x-ray spectrum that had resonant energy transitions that couple with nuclear gamma isomeric energy states of a single isotope. I am not clear if Peter’s model considered all

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: The reason why there is no gamma stems from the transfer of spin energy in small quanta of angular momentum—nuclear to electric—with the same entangled system—the crystalline lattice of the host material.  The time frame may be very short—less than a femto-

RE: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

The reason why there is no gamma stems from the transfer of spin energy in small quanta of angular momentum—nuclear to elecroic—with the same entangled system—the crystalline lattice of the host material. The time frame may be very short—less than a femto- second. The new entangled system

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

H LV wrote: > Remember 10-12 years ago the buzz around x-rays from peeling > tape?https://youtu.be/r63e5y3Z3R8 > If this way of generating x-rays could be harnessed it would make this > lattice confinement fusion more economical. That is a QM effect which does not scale up. The same could be

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

This is just a variant of TRIBOLUMINESCENCE. From: H LV Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 10:36 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion Remember 10-12 years ago the buzz around x-rays

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

Remember 10-12 years ago the buzz around x-rays from peeling tape? https://youtu.be/r63e5y3Z3R8 If this way of generating x-rays could be harnessed it would make this lattice confinement fusion more economical. Harry On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:56 AM Jack Cole wrote: > It is also hard to not see

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

It is also hard to not see some parallels with our last experiments (2016) with TiH2, nickel sheets, and light. On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:58 PM Jones Beene wrote: > Ha! The new and improved new wording is interesting in a semantic sense... > but get real... > > Of course it is the demon cold

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

Hi, Consider this, to split a deuteron costs 2.2 MeV. Hot fusion of two deuterons yields about 4 MeV. At best this would never yield more than about a factor of 2and that's not taking into account any of the losses. And those losses will be very significant. 1) Maybe 1% of the electrons

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:58:16 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] > Ha! The new and improved new wording is interesting in a semantic sense... > but get real... > >Of course it is the demon cold fusion, but now we can pivot around that stigma >and instead present it all in

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

In reply to Jack Cole's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:28:45 -0500: Hi, [snip] >They are careful to say it's not CF. Sure seems like it originated in CF ...sounds a bit like Let Us Confuse You. ;) >methods. > >https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/nuclear-fusiontokamak-not-included

Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

Ha! The new and improved new wording is interesting in a semantic sense... but get real... Of course it is the demon cold fusion, but now we can pivot around that stigma and instead present it all in on a different geometry... very little changes but the word salad. IOW it is the same old