After reading the decision of the patent examiner, my impression is that
the patent was rejected for good reason. The rejection argument is not
that the theory is wrong but that Mills is trying to patent a theory and
its application to calculating electron states. This would be like
having a
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:40 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO
snip
What I'd like to know is whether UK IPO's final decision was due to a
difference in
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the
calculation of electron states via software simulations.
Is this latest battle related to Randy's Millsian Molecular Modeling
endeavors, or is this a follow-up to recent
Can theories be copyrighted?
Harry
On 12/5/2008 4:37 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the
calculation of electron states via software simulations.
Is this latest battle related
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent
Howdy Mike,
And thus we gain another glimpse of the new century strategies being used to
capture revenue streams derived from intellectual property... or should I
say properties. Actually the field remains open to a new legimate form of
pirating ownership before discovery. hmmm
Google
6 matches
Mail list logo
