Hadn't noticed but Akira linked to Celani's report above.
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/PresICCF17_NewA3A.pdf
Excellent level of detail, including exact alloy used (isotan44, a constant
electrical resistivity alloy) should allow for many replication attempts -
and just one flawless public
On 2012-08-07 10:55, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Please watch this from minute 15:00 onward:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxjxFdFEBsw
Cheers,
S.A.
This idea that radiation can be stopped in an unshielded robust device is
generally incorrect. The claim indicates the proponent is unfamiliar with
Maxwell-Boltzmann energy distributions.
There are few physical phenomena which are simpler and more certain to
measure in tiny amounts than nuclear
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hadn't noticed but Akira linked to Celani's report above.
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/PresICCF17_NewA3A.pdf
That's pretty good! I uploaded it already.
- Jed
I've just make quick computation showing, with celani data in the paper and
at NIWeek,
that :
- chemical can be ruled out, even wit 95% anomaly error
- if surface is the only active environment, using micrometric particle
lead to power density of 10kW/g of powder, 10 times above the claim of
Rossi
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Please watch this from minute 15:00 onward:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxjxFdFEBsw
That's great!
Finally, we are seeing some real progress. I think I'll put in the News
section at LENR-CANR.org. If I have time today . . .
I'll put a link to Krivit's report as
Note that CEO Dr James Truchard is no newcomer to the field, with his interest
beginning in 1989. Can't go back much further than that.
Note also that the good Doctor, at 16:53 recommends dropping the names
cold-fusion or LENR in favor of quantum reactor ... to me this is tacit
admission that
On 2012-08-08 20:23, Jones Beene wrote:
Note also that the good Doctor, at 16:53 recommends dropping the names cold-fusion or
LENR in favor of quantum reactor ... to me this is tacit admission that NI
has seen no evidence of nuclear reactions which are even close to commensurate with the
Dreaded or not dreaded, the process is nuclear. Just take a look to
Piantelli's opuses or to the paradigm changing presentation of John
Hadjichristos today at NI Week.
Fortunately it is mildly and intelligently nuclear.
Peter
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Akira Shirakawa
Peter,
Can you cite a Piantelli paper where deuterium was absent, but where the
transmutation products were well-correlated with excess energy?
I think not. This is the same problem that Krivit finds with the lame
correlation of helium to excess energy in Pd-D. I'm not saying that Krivit
dear Jones,
Pisntelli (and FYI the Defkalion process) does not work with deuterium- not
at all. It is rather difficult to determine the transmutation products at
the Piantelli process.
DGTG in their process they are using very good analytical techniques but
it is difficult to calculate the
At 10:16 AM 8/8/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Please watch this from minute
15:00 onward:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxjxFdFEBsw
There's a rough transcript at
http://ecatnews.com/?p=2291
Photo of some attendees and ID's ... including Alexandros Xanthoulis
(Defkalion GT
That is exciting! It seems everyone is in Austin this week. I wish I could
have gone but I have to prepare for ICCF17. It seems they will all be there
next week.
That is good report by Krivit. If he had only left out the B.S. about
opposition to Ni-H research it would have been better.
As far as
I wrote:
As far as I know, the first person to advocate the use of nickel was
Martin Fleischmann, FRS.
The reason he was interested is obvious. Early on he estimated how much
energy can be produced with palladium, given the total world stocks and
mining output. as I recall he determined that
Notice the last comment ...
... she's [sic] back
-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/08/07/lenr-gets-major-boost-from-national-instruments/
On 2012-08-07 10:55, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Update from 22passi from Celani himself (Passerini contacted him by phone):
Google translated, Google shortened link to the blogpost:
http://goo.gl/v4Opj
Short summary
- Celani's demo reactor was turned on for about 6 hours before
Well - vortex may have played a part, behind the scenes, in this work. Why?
The first paragraph of Celani's paper mentions the Romanowski paper and the
Constantan alloy he is using.
As to how that gets back to this us - it was first mentioned about a year ago,
see:
On 2012-08-07 20:09, Jones Beene wrote:
There is no beta or gamma radiation happening with the excess energy at all.
This is NOT a nuclear reaction.
They did observe X rays (and/or gamma emission) under certain
conditions however (see section IV.23, page 4).
Cheers
S.A.
attention...
-Mark Iverson
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:10 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Celani's Ni-H demo at NIWeek2012
Well - vortex may have played a part, behind the scenes, in this work. Why
...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:10 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Celani's Ni-H demo at NIWeek2012
Well - vortex may have played a part, behind the scenes, in this work. Why?
The first paragraph of Celani's paper mentions the Romanowski paper and the
Constantan
Yes, thanks for setting the record straight on that point. I tend to get a bit
carried away in having to continually make the point that the excess energy in
this reaction is not nuclear to an overwhelming degree.
Small amounts of radiation are seen, often on startup. The radiation is seldom
-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Celani's Ni-H demo at NIWeek2012
So it wasn’t Colonel Mustard with the lead pipe, but the Polish Alloyist with
the Constantin wire!
:-)
And the first Clue
No a good conclusion.
it can be nuclear without externally visible radiation.
Raduation can be stopped (alpha , beta),
and phonons could dissipate energy too.
neutrons could be slow and undetectable,
charged particles could be easily stopped...
let's dont fall in the initial error to apply old
Nice to see some positive results coming in from someone who is prepared to
share their results. Any word on temperature of reaction?
On 7 August 2012 09:55, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello group,
This new blogpost by Steven Krivit is certainly worth a read. It's about
Le Aug 7, 2012 à 12:45 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com a écrit :
No a good conclusion.
it can be nuclear without externally visible radiation.
Raduation can be stopped (alpha , beta),
and phonons could dissipate energy too.
neutrons could be slow and undetectable,
charged particles
25 matches
Mail list logo
