Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin

2014-04-23 Thread Jed Rothwell 
G-mail thinks this is spam. This is an example of a short message that was
rejected.

- Jed


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:

 Greetings Vortex-L,

 Never knew such rotations were possible:
 *https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin
 https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin*

 *Ad Astra,*
 *Ron Kita, Chiralex*
 *Of note: Camphor molecules are spherical and can attain very high
 rotations..even in the solid state. S.O. Morgan of Bell Labs.*

Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin

2014-04-23 Thread Axil Axil 
This message was rejected to my spam when it was posted originally, but now
the spam override filter I installed seems to be working for this message
retransmission.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:

 Greetings Vortex-L,

 Never knew such rotations were possible:
 *https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin
 https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin*

 *Ad Astra,*
 *Ron Kita, Chiralex*
 *Of note: Camphor molecules are spherical and can attain very high
 rotations..even in the solid state. S.O. Morgan of Bell Labs.*

Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin

2014-04-23 Thread Terry Blanton 
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
 G-mail thinks this is spam. This is an example of a short message that was
 rejected.

I suppose we must have experienced something like this before since
some of us, myself included, already had a filter which routes
messages with the [VT] prefix to the inbox.

Hmm, was that why the [VT] prefix was established by Bill.  Damned if
I can remember.

Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin

2014-04-23 Thread Jed Rothwell 
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
  G-mail thinks this is spam. This is an example of a short message that
 was
  rejected.

 I suppose we must have experienced something like this before since
 some of us, myself included, already had a filter which routes
 messages with the [VT] prefix to the inbox.


I have it filtered by the To: field. I do not need the [VT]. The filter
parameters are:


Matches: to:(vortex-l@eskimo.com)
Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label Vortex, Never send it to
Spam


G-mail has good filtering capabilities.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin

2014-04-23 Thread Terry Blanton 
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have it filtered by the To: field. I do not need the [VT]. The filter
 parameters are:


 Matches: to:(vortex-l@eskimo.com)
 Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label Vortex, Never send it to
 Spam

Hah!  I have that one too.  When did we create them?  Or is your
memory as bad as mine?  :-)

Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin

2014-04-23 Thread Jed Rothwell 
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:


  Matches: to:(vortex-l@eskimo.com)
  Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label Vortex, Never send it to
  Spam

 Hah!  I have that one too.  When did we create them?  Or is your
 memory as bad as mine?  :-)


There is no date on the filters. If the computer doesn't know, I don't know.

Here is something clever in the g-mail Settings, under the General tab:


Undo Send:
Enable Undo Send
Send cancellation period: 5102030 seconds


This gives you 5 seconds to recall an e-mail. This feature was introduced
without fanfare last year.

Another handy trick is Ctrl-space to remove formatting.

Google does not list their keystroke macros anywhere as far as I know.
(Keystroke macro = shortcut).

- Jed