In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 10 May 2011 15:38:31 -0700:
Hi,
Good work Robin!
However, would you not agree with me that this reaction, however desirable,
is unlikely due to VB finding zero gammas?
Jones
Little less likely than a n-B10 reaction.
It has the additional benefit that
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 9 May 2011 11:12:34 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Hmm ... Well actually, the boron could be the critical difference, and until
today it has been under the radar - have you seen anyone even consider the
possibility that boron could be the active heat source?
Yes -
Good work Robin!
However, would you not agree with me that this reaction, however desirable,
is unlikely due to VB finding zero gammas?
Jones
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Hmm ... Well actually, the boron could be the critical difference, and
until today it has been
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The situation is as clear as mud. See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3173090.ece
- Jed
I like the formulation nanometric nickel particles No word of
catalysis-yet.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter
In a quick count of metals employed in this patent, copper is mentioned
seven times and nickel six times.
The testing of active powder in Sweden has shown a natural isotope balance
of copper, and no radioactivity.
Given that nickel has the second most stable nucleus in the periodic table,
* I will add, in deference to WL theory and the ULM, that the stated
presence of boron does provide a more acceptable pathway for the high gain.
This would be due to the very high cross-section of boron for neutrons
(thermal neutrons). I do not know that boron retains the high cross-section
This is a boron day for me . g not boring but boronic.
Every day provides new or previously overlooked details, and perhaps an
element of Rossi's good fortune will be that someone, probably not from U of
B, but from somewhere else is going to provide answers that could help him.
The role of
In matter of neutrons, Hideo Kozima has a lot of publications. His TNCF
(trapped neutron catalyzed fusion)
is described the best ib his book:
The Science of the Cold Fusion Phenomenon, Elsevier Ed.
2006
Peter
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This is a
From: Peter Gluck
In matter of neutrons, Hideo Kozima has a lot of publications. His TNCF
(trapped neutron catalyzed fusion) is described the best in his book:
The Science of the Cold Fusion Phenomenon, Elsevier Ed. 2006
Peter
Found this scanned paper from ICCF7:
Jones,
I think you nailed it on the copper migration since it appears the copper
tube is buried in the powder but when they say said copper tube further
including at least a heating electrical resistance are they
Implying the internal resistor is INSIDE the copper pipe?
Fran
9. An
OMG - Lazar and Jarod do their boron shtick ...
http://www.ufomind.com/area51/desert_rat/1995/dr24/#boron
To quote from this unassailable source of info: The vast majority of the
world's Boron comes from the United States, and most of that is extracted
from a big hole in the ground at--you
Thanks, if it is about priority, we have to take Hideo in consideration.
Peter
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Peter Gluck **
* *
In matter of neutrons, Hideo Kozima has a lot of publications. His TNCF
(trapped neutron catalyzed fusion) is
How does the Rossi device drive the electromigration of copper?
Harry
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 9:43:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik reports on Rossi patent
In a quick count of metals employed in this patent, copper is mentioned
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473cpage=8#comment-37766
Luis Vaccaro
May 9th, 2011 at 3:05 AM
Dear Mr Rossi,
Just some curiosities:
1) do you explain all about the secret catalyst in you patent?
2) if this is the case, the nature of the catalyst will be revealed after
the
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 1:23:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik reports on Rossi patent
From:Harry Veeder
How does the Rossi device drive the electromigration of copper?
Galvanic corrosion …. Well known between nickel
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
How does the Rossi device drive the electromigration of copper?
Galvanic corrosion …. Well known between nickel and copper
HV: Doesn't that require some moisture between the copper and nickel?
Not necessarily 'moisture' so much as a solvent or
I am eager for that patent to be published! I want to learn what the catalyst
is!
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 11:12:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik reports on Rossi patent
-Original Message
: Mon, May 9, 2011 8:02:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik reports on Rossi patent
Jones,
I think you nailed it on the copper migration since it appears the copper tube
is buried in the powder but when they say “said copper tube further including
at
least a heating electrical resistance
, May 9, 2011 6:43:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik reports on Rossi patent
In a quick count of metals employed in this patent, copper is mentioned seven
times and nickel six times.
The testing of active powder in Sweden has shown a natural isotope balance of
copper, and no radioactivity
From: noone noone
1) The reactor vessel is composed of stainless steel that does not contain
copper.
Not according to the patent.
2) Copper appears in the nickel powder.
Yes, and it gets there by a scientifically valid process.
It's pretty obvious that nickel is
20 matches
Mail list logo
