On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:54:35PM -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
CF/LENR is not a giant effect. It is a phenomenon of Nature that is not
understood well enough to make large yet.
On rare occasions it has been large, when people used very large
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
This is often stated, but of course it's nonsense. Who could reject a
phenomenon that replaces fossil fuels? That powers a car without
refueling?
This is precisely my problem
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The reaction cannot be scaled up safely because it is not well understood
yet and it cannot be controlled, as Ed says.
Rationalization. Everyone wants to see a bigger effect, whether it takes
more material or not.
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:25:11AM -0500, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Regardless of what is suggested as evidence, you will find a way to reject
it.
This is often stated, but of course it's nonsense. Who could reject a
Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
This is often stated, but of course it's nonsense. Who could reject a
phenomenon that replaces fossil fuels? That powers a car without
refueling?
This is precisely my problem with claimed evidence for CF/LENR.
Read history and you will see that many
On May 7, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:25:11AM -0500, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Regardless of what is suggested as evidence, you will find a way
to reject
it.
This is often stated,
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
CF/LENR is not a giant effect. It is a phenomenon of Nature that is not
understood well enough to make large yet.
On rare occasions it has been large, when people used very large cathodes.
Mizuno observed several days of heat after death at about
7 matches
Mail list logo
