Re: [vos-d] Re: struggling with Windows...

2005-08-16 Thread Braden McDaniel
res wrote: On 16.08.2005 22:24, Braden McDaniel wrote: Well that's annoying. So why bother with msvcr71.dll at all? Why not just build with /MT instead and pull in the static library? What does using the DLL runtime buy you? Disk and RAM space savings if you have multiple modules. shrug

Re: [vos-d] Re: struggling with Windows...

2005-08-16 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 22:11 -0400, Peter Amstutz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Braden McDaniel wrote: One heap - you can free memory allocated in some other module. That's the major selling point. Doing without this is giving up a lot

Re: [vos-d] VOS 0.23.0-pre2 released

2006-02-27 Thread Braden McDaniel
not gonna work. You'll have to get a build that has RTTI enabled. It might be worth talking to the Fink packager about this. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://endoframe.comJabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [vos-d] VOS requirements

2007-01-25 Thread Braden McDaniel
. Anyone who's ever used HTML and CSS should be seeing an analogy here. Whether the semantic metadata lives out-of-band or in the scene, coupling the nature of its specification to that of the geometry seems like the Wrong Way. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED