Re: [vos-d] Re: Swig

2006-03-12 Thread Hugh Perkins
Hi Lalo, Yes, you're right, for many applications weak typing is better, because it produces more compact, easier to read code.On 3/13/06, Lalo Martins < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:And so says Hugh Perkins on 12/03/06 14:27... > Just to throw some salt in the wounds of the Python discussions, I cant

[vos-d] Re: Swig

2006-03-12 Thread Lalo Martins
And so says Hugh Perkins on 12/03/06 14:27... > Just to throw some salt in the wounds of the Python discussions, I cant > help thinking that C# has all the advantages of both Python (run from > source, easy to read) and C++ (strong typing, runs quickly). agreeing to that would require me to agree