-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some downsides to doing this are:
1. The VOS API is supposed to be stabalizing. I don't know if
libraries are considered part of the API but anyone who started writing
something using 0.22 is going to be annoyed when they upgrade.
2. Now a
Hello all,I think reducing the VOS libs is a good idea, less linking means quicker builds right? As far as I can tell there aren't that many applications using VOS (ter'angreal and betaverse are the only 2 current projects i can think of at the moment) so now would be the time to make serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Jason Moyers wrote:
Hello all,
I think reducing the VOS libs is a good idea, less linking means quicker
builds right? As far as I can tell there aren't that many applications using
VOS (ter'angreal and betaverse are the only 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got a big whack of coding done last night, which was very satisfying :-)
Something that occurred to me, though, was the current tendency in VOS to
over-modularize and have a proliferation of small libraries. While this
makes sense for
I think I agree with you Peter, having them as a separate library doesn't make too much sense. You could perhaps use a separate namespace or something?
Beyond reading the mailing lists, I've not been following VOS a huge amount recently.So to answer the question I guess you just have to ask if it
