Quoting Bill Kendrick (n...@sonic.net):
> My problem was that the subject lines were all the same: a generic
> message telling me something got auto-discarded.
Just to be clear, I wasn't referring to the '(n) messages were
discarded' advisories.
In the model where non-subscriber postings get
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:09:14AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Bill Kendrick (n...@sonic.net):
>
> > Well, this wasn't clearing of Mailman's queue, but of my inbox.
> > (Technically, a mailbox that slurps up all of the mailman administrative
> > noise, via a good ol' procmail filter)
>
> I
Quoting Bill Kendrick (n...@sonic.net):
> Well, this wasn't clearing of Mailman's queue, but of my inbox.
> (Technically, a mailbox that slurps up all of the mailman administrative
> noise, via a good ol' procmail filter)
I do sympathise.
Personally, I've gotten really quick at quick-scanning
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:07:33PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
>
> I mention all of the above because I keep finding Mailman admins doing
> 'mind numbing and tedious' manual clearing of queues, unaware that
> automatic expiry would do this work for them without any of that hassle.
Well, this wasn't
Quoting Bill Kendrick (n...@sonic.net):
> I did not bother having posts held ("HOLD" option, vs "DISCARD"), since it
> was a very rare occurrence. These days, since the mailing list volume is
> extremely low (but the spammers still try sending messages to the list
> address), almost ALL
