Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Brewer
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:12 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote: So, from where I sit, we have: 1. Many header values which are ASCII. 2. A few header values which are ISO-8859-1 plus RFC 2047. 3. A few header values which are URI's (no specified encoding) or IRI's (UTF-8). I

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Sergey Schetinin
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:03, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/4/17 James Y Knight f...@fuhm.net: On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: I am not sure we ended up with a final answer on all of this, but I don't want to hold up mod_wsgi 3.0, which includes

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/4/17 Robert Brewer fuman...@aminus.org: On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:12 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote: So, from where I sit, we have:  1. Many header values which are ASCII.  2. A few header values which are ISO-8859-1 plus RFC 2047.  3. A few header values which are URI's (no

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Brewer
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:37 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote: I am not sure we ended up with a final answer on all of this, but I don't want to hold up mod_wsgi 3.0, which includes Python 3.0 support, any longer. As such, am implementing things as per: