Hello,
can anyone give me the version number XSLT support was added to Safari?
Thanks,
Johann
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Hey everyone-
We're very excited to be putting our Windows WebKit code in WebKit
repository, and are getting ready to start the merge very soon! I'd
like to request that no one make any commits to the WebKit repository
until our merge is finished, as we will be getting down-n-dirty with
It is important for the ResourceHandle in the apollo port to have
access to WebView state. We can live with a pointer to the Frame,
FrameLoader, Page, or any other object that allows us to walk back to
our WebView. We could add a factory method on FrameLoaderClient to
construct
Andreas,
Your SVG pages worked just fine for me on Safari 3 with Windows XP (nothing
crashed). Although the animation didn't work so I presume that WebKit is
limited with respect to SVG at the moment and there is no SMIL in WebKit. I
wonder if there is interest in integrating SMIL into WebKit?
Sergio, there is interest in having SVG animation support, and a
reasonable amount is implemented. Currently animation is turned off
by default, due to its tendency to crash.
You're welcome to work on it as well if you're interested :D
--Oliver
On 12/06/2007, at 4:20 PM, Sergio Trejo wrote:
In the meantime, will you accept a patch to add a
Frame pointer to loadResourceSynchronously?
--- Darin Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle
is intended to be
a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make
sense to have
higher level
I went ahead and filed a bug for this issue:
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14106
--- Morgan L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime, will you accept a patch to add a
Frame pointer to loadResourceSynchronously?
--- Darin Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to
have higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly we'll need to
make a design change so there's a higher
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to
have higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly
--- Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this.
ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it
doesn't make sense
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Morgan L wrote:
--- Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this.
ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level
11 matches
Mail list logo
