Hi,
I am using the free scale imx3-stack board. It has embedded linux. Could
any one help me on how to use web kit on embedded linux for browsing ?
Regds,
S.Ramesh Chandra.
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Hi,
I am new to webkit. Yester day I downloaded the sources on to my Red hat
enterprise linux 9. I tried to compile with the following command.
QTDIR=/usr/share/qt4/ WebKit/WebKitTools/Scripts/build-webkit
I am getting the following error.
Calling 'qmake CONFIG+=qt-port –r
Thanks Adam.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Adam Roben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
It took me a while to get my windows build going, so I thought I'd share
what I learned:
Thanks, Mike! This kind of information is very helpful in keeping our
Hello,
Disclaimer: I'm more of a GTK+/Debian guy =).
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:31 -0400, Ramesh Satyavaram wrote:
I am new to webkit. Yester day I downloaded the sources on to my Red
hat enterprise linux 9. I tried to compile with the following command.
There is no such thing as Red Hat
On Oct 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
It took me a while to get my windows build going, so I thought I'd
share what I learned:
Thanks, Mike! This kind of information is very helpful in keeping our
instructions up-to-date.
1) I had to completely start over with cygwin. I
hiya folks,
last month or so i added glib bindings to webkit, in order to make
them available via pygtk's codegen.py as python bindings, for
pywebkitgtk. to make that as clear as mud: around webkit's c++ DOM
bindings i added glib bindings so that i could add python bindings.
wait - don't laugh -
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21598
copy of the bugreport is here:
a c struct containing pointers to higher order functions. used extensively in
FreeDCE, linux kernel and the NT 4.0 kernel (e.g. the Lsa Security).
good library interfaces are _so_ divorced from other libraries that
The term webkit core in your subject is very confusing. Do you mean
WebKit or WebCore? There is platform-specific code in both.
dave
On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21598
copy of the bugreport is here:
a c struct
I currently see nameGetter, namedItem
and getNamedItem in a number of different files that all currently
have custom bindings that normalize to a nameGetter function.
Can we just have all the collection types normalize on a single name
for this function? It would mean that much of this custom
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ojan Vafai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently see nameGetter, namedItem
and getNamedItem in a number of different files that all currently have
custom bindings that normalize to a nameGetter function.
Can we just have all the collection types normalize on
On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
I currently see nameGetter, namedItem and getNamedItem in a number
of different files that all currently have custom bindings that
normalize to a nameGetter function.
Can we just have all the collection types normalize on a single name
11 matches
Mail list logo