[webkit-dev] help needed on compiling the webkit on embedded linux platform.

2008-10-14 Thread Ramesh Satyavaram
Hi, I am using the free scale imx3-stack board. It has embedded linux. Could any one help me on how to use web kit on embedded linux for browsing ? Regds, S.Ramesh Chandra. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org

[webkit-dev] Unable to compile the webkit on the Redhat enterprise linux 9

2008-10-14 Thread Ramesh Satyavaram
Hi, I am new to webkit. Yester day I downloaded the sources on to my Red hat enterprise linux 9. I tried to compile with the following command. QTDIR=/usr/share/qt4/ WebKit/WebKitTools/Scripts/build-webkit I am getting the following error. Calling 'qmake CONFIG+=qt-port –r

Re: [webkit-dev] My Windows build notes

2008-10-14 Thread Mike Belshe
Thanks Adam. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Adam Roben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: It took me a while to get my windows build going, so I thought I'd share what I learned: Thanks, Mike! This kind of information is very helpful in keeping our

Re: [webkit-dev] Unable to compile the webkit on the Redhat enterprise linux 9

2008-10-14 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Hello, Disclaimer: I'm more of a GTK+/Debian guy =). On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:31 -0400, Ramesh Satyavaram wrote: I am new to webkit. Yester day I downloaded the sources on to my Red hat enterprise linux 9. I tried to compile with the following command. There is no such thing as Red Hat

Re: [webkit-dev] My Windows build notes

2008-10-14 Thread Adam Roben
On Oct 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: It took me a while to get my windows build going, so I thought I'd share what I learned: Thanks, Mike! This kind of information is very helpful in keeping our instructions up-to-date. 1) I had to completely start over with cygwin. I

[webkit-dev] python bindings to qwebkit - who's responsible for doing this work (anyone?)

2008-10-14 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
hiya folks, last month or so i added glib bindings to webkit, in order to make them available via pygtk's codegen.py as python bindings, for pywebkitgtk. to make that as clear as mud: around webkit's c++ DOM bindings i added glib bindings so that i could add python bindings. wait - don't laugh -

[webkit-dev] webkit core need to be cleanly separated from ports, behind a vector table

2008-10-14 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21598 copy of the bugreport is here: a c struct containing pointers to higher order functions. used extensively in FreeDCE, linux kernel and the NT 4.0 kernel (e.g. the Lsa Security). good library interfaces are _so_ divorced from other libraries that

Re: [webkit-dev] webkit core need to be cleanly separated from ports, behind a vector table

2008-10-14 Thread David Hyatt
The term webkit core in your subject is very confusing. Do you mean WebKit or WebCore? There is platform-specific code in both. dave On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21598 copy of the bugreport is here: a c struct

[webkit-dev] bindings layer should have a consistent way of getting at named items in collections

2008-10-14 Thread Ojan Vafai
I currently see nameGetter, namedItem and getNamedItem in a number of different files that all currently have custom bindings that normalize to a nameGetter function. Can we just have all the collection types normalize on a single name for this function? It would mean that much of this custom

Re: [webkit-dev] bindings layer should have a consistent way of getting at named items in collections

2008-10-14 Thread Sam Weinig
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ojan Vafai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I currently see nameGetter, namedItem and getNamedItem in a number of different files that all currently have custom bindings that normalize to a nameGetter function. Can we just have all the collection types normalize on

Re: [webkit-dev] bindings layer should have a consistent way of getting at named items in collections

2008-10-14 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: I currently see nameGetter, namedItem and getNamedItem in a number of different files that all currently have custom bindings that normalize to a nameGetter function. Can we just have all the collection types normalize on a single name