Thanks a lot. It solve my problem.
Regards,
Diego
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Chris Hatko cha...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume this is a release build ... I ran into this problem myself.
You can switch to 64Bit OS or turn off whole program optimization
/GL and corresponding linker flag.
Hi,
Continuing color management discussion, it would be great to get
advice for some of the questions I have before starting coding up.
There are already some libraries to parser and convert icc profiles.
One of them is little cms[1] and it's being used by many applications,
specially because
01.09.2010, в 08:31, Igor Trindade Oliveira написал(а):
a) use an external dependency(littlecms for example);
b) write from scratch all the ICC Profile specification;
What do you guys think what the best approach?
I think that the first question to answer is why a CMS implementation is
2010/9/1 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org:
01.09.2010, в 08:31, Igor Trindade Oliveira написал(а):
a) use an external dependency(littlecms for example);
b) write from scratch all the ICC Profile specification;
What do you guys think what the best approach?
I think that the first
On Aug 31, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
...Yes, I did the Google search and you're right that the
On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
But I agree with Maciej that all of the public API is transformation
oriented. Even things like inverse() and transpose() have application in
doing transforms. I think it would be a stretch to use this 4x4 matrix for
general purposes. A
On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Igor Trindade Oliveira wrote:
2010/9/1 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org:
01.09.2010, в 08:31, Igor Trindade Oliveira написал(а):
a) use an external dependency(littlecms for example);
b) write from scratch all the ICC Profile specification;
What do you
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
But I agree with Maciej that all of the public API is transformation
oriented. Even
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a closer look at
WebKit's Arena class. Turns out it's not a class at all, just some structs
and macros. That seems very un-WebKit-like to me. Ken's patch also has a
PODArena class, which uses Arena in its implementation. Sam suggests
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a closer look at
WebKit's Arena class. Turns out it's not a class at all, just some structs
and macros. That seems very un-WebKit-like to me. Ken's patch also has a
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a closer look at
WebKit's Arena class. Turns out it's not a class at all, just some structs
and macros. That seems very un-WebKit-like to me. Ken's patch also has a
PODArena class,
Thanks.
So porting PrettyPatch to Python will make good benefit and should have no
drawbacks. I should go ahead.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 09:21, William Siegrist wsiegr...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 4:43 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
Can we run python scripts on bugs.webkit.org
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a closer look at
WebKit's Arena class. Turns out it's not a class at all, just some structs
and macros. That seems very
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a closer look at
WebKit's Arena class. Turns out it's not a
On Sep 1, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a
We should just kill Arena and remove it and RenderArena both.
dave
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and take a closer look at
WebKit's Arena class. Turns out it's not a class at all, just some structs
and macros. That seems
On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:04 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
We should just kill Arena and remove it and RenderArena both.
Wasn't it still a measurable slowdown last time we tried that?
- Maciej
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Ken's PODRedBlackTree patch has made me go back and
On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:04 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
We should just kill Arena and remove it and RenderArena both.
Wasn't it still a measurable slowdown last time we tried that?
Not enough to matter. We could easily make up the
Please let's not add another client of Arena though. That will just make it
harder to remove, and I highly doubt you're getting any real performance gain
from using it.
dave
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
I would be happy to not add another Arena client, but the primary
reason I need an arena is not just for performance but to avoid having
to keep track of all of the objects I need to delete.
Is there any consensus yet on how to proceed with
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45059 ? I'm
Sorry, I seemed to have missed this thread. Please do not rewrite scripts
just to rewrite them in a language you like. WebKit's dependency on Ruby is
here to stay. Just because python is common at Google does not make it
universal.
-Sam
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, TAMURA, Kent
Here are the list of files in the project which use ruby:
Scripts/check-for-inappropriate-files-in-framework:#!/usr/bin/env ruby
Scripts/check-for-webkit-framework-include-consistency:#!/usr/bin/env ruby
Scripts/clean-header-guards:#!/usr/bin/ruby
Scripts/roll-over-ChangeLogs:#!/usr/bin/env ruby
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:56 AM, TAMURA, Kent tk...@chromium.org wrote:
Do we have any recommendation of programming language for scripts such as
WebKitTools/Scripts?
It seems new scripts are written by Python and Ruby code is very rare.
Is it reasonable to port a Ruby script to Python?
Hi Sam,
Did you see the reply I sent on this thread? There are actually decent
reasons to rewrite the code into Python, to simplify and speed up the
new-run-webkit-tests implementation. Given that, do you still object
to the patch landing (since the work has already been done)?
-- Dirk
On Wed,
From reading this thread and the bug, it sounds like there is one key issue
installing something new on build machines.
As discussed before in regards to python, there was a desire not to go above
a certain version so that the tiger build machine could run a script. That
seemed reasonable to me.
25 matches
Mail list logo
