scope this discussion to RW and DPR. This is consistent with
Blink implementation [1], and to keep this thread focused I'll skip the
comments on MD/RQ/etc. That said, happy to discuss those in a separate thread
:)
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m
On Apr 29, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Martin Robinson mrobin...@webkit.org wrote:
Hi, please forgive my continuing quest into the realm of small build cleanups.
We have some handy WTF macros to deal with build variables. For example
#if ENABLE(WHATEVER)
will be true if ENABLE_WHATEVER is
On Apr 23, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Yoav Weiss y...@yoav.ws wrote:
Hi,
As I've discussed during my session at the contributor's meetup, I'm
interested in implementing Client-Hints
http://igrigorik.github.io/http-client-hints/ in WebKit.
For those unfamiliar with it, Client-Hints is a
, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Yoav Weiss y...@yoav.ws
mailto:y...@yoav.ws wrote:
Hi,
As I've discussed during my session at the contributor's meetup, I'm
interested in implementing Client-Hints
http://igrigorik.github.io/http
On Apr 23, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 21, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Chris Dumez cdu...@apple.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to suggest we remove support for 'multipart/x-mixed-replace’
main resources while keeping support for multipart images.
Based on
On Apr 8, 2015, at 5:42 AM, Antti Koivisto koivi...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org
mailto:benja...@webkit.org wrote:
Hi WebKit,
The two features.json files are in the tree (WebCore/features.json and
JavaScriptCore/features.json). The
if the other eight EWS bots are sitting dormant.
Is there some other processing metric you are concerned about?
Brent Fulgham - Apple Inc.
On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Is it possible to make EWS start processing changes more promptly?
On Apr 1
Is it possible to make EWS start processing changes more promptly?
On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@apple.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We lost Windows EWS coverage for the past 36 hours due to a very
benign-appearing change to some webkitpy code. I haven’t yet figured out
We’ll have times when we need to decide what goes into this library, and what
goes into WTF. So I like the ones that fit the sentence “Is this really WTF or
is it just __?”
LOL, ROFL and ROFLCOPTER work well for this. I would also suggest:
Web Abstraction Toolbox (it’s hard to tell the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On 3/18/15 9:43 PM, Myles C. Maxfield wrote:
Hello, all,
I’d like to announce that I intend to create
On Mar 19, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Anders Carlsson ander...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m...@apple.com wrote:
This almost makes me want to suggest a jokey name for Platform. I can’t off
the top of my head think of a good expansion
On Mar 19, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On 3/18/15 9:43 PM, Myles C. Maxfield wrote:
Hello, all,
I’d like to announce that I intend to create a standalone static library
from the current contents of WebCore/platform over the coming months. This
will
legacy features we remove all the time. This
simple valuable code that happen to be untested because of the lack of ARMv7
infrastructure on the public bots.
Regarding maintenance, I'd be happy to fix bugs in that code.
Benjamin
On 3/9/15 11:34 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Requiring
Requiring a perf bot to be set up before removing unmaintained code seems like
a really high bar. What would it take to do a one-shot test of whether
NEON_INTRINSICS is a perf benefit? Would it show up on PLT or on JS perf
benchmarks if you compiled with it? If it’s not a speedup in its
In case you still want an answer to the original question - I would expect good
programming practice to be that you explicitly list all your relevant cases in
a switch statement, so hitting default should never happen or should be a rare
exception. But I don’t know if real programs are like
Perhaps we should document this in the coding style guidelines. I like
consistency and static member function seems like a good way to go,
particularly since it matches the Class::create() pattern we often use for
non-singletons.
On Jan 28, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
On Jan 28, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
I like the economy of the smaller non-member function name; it seems overly
wordy to be constantly stating the class name as well as the nearly
meaningless word “shared”. I think the word “shared” is what I like least
about
Dumez - Apple Inc.
Cupertino, CA
On Jan 28, 2015, at 8:44 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@igalia.com
mailto:mcatanz...@igalia.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m...@apple.com wrote:
Yet another possibility is finding a better name than
On Dec 3, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
03 дек. 2014 г., в 2:32, Daniel Lazarenko dani...@opera.com написал(а):
Whatsoever it would be nice find a new reviewer for my patch. Does anybody
want to take it?
Just to be clear about this part, the reviewer
On Nov 20, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
19 нояб. 2014 г., в 14:58, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
mailto:a...@webkit.org написал(а):
These and related uses are all over the place - see also Vectors in
FormDataBuilder, data returned from
On Nov 20, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 20, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
mailto:a...@webkit.org wrote:
19 нояб. 2014 г., в 14:58, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
mailto:a...@webkit.org написал(а):
These and related
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:28 AM, youenn fablet youe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I looked at the Networking process recently and am wondering what is
in scope/out of scope of this process.
Currently, the networking process is used to load resources from:
- URLs resolved
We will probably bring it up on es-discuss once we’ve had a chance to discuss
it among WebKit folks.
- Maciej
On Sep 28, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Could this thread maybe be moved to es-discuss?
___
webkit-dev
Dan, you say that SIMD.js delivers performance portability, and Nadav says it
doesn’t.
Nadav’s argument seems to come down to (as I understand it):
- The set of vector operations supported on different CPU architectures varies
widely.
- Executing vector intrinsics on processors that don’t
On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Dean Jackson d...@apple.com wrote:
Hi floks,
Things are a bit confusing in the OS X and iOS build configurations because
we have both a FeatureDefines.h and a set of .xcconfig files, often defining
the same thing, and sometimes inconsistently (or at least
(*) I think Apple's Windows port should probably continue with
FeatureDefines.h because it doesn't use Xcode.
BTW, the canonical place (I think) for feature flags for the Windows port is in
WebKitLibraries/win/tools/vsprops. Confusion about where the feature flag
settings go for
On Jul 28, 2014, at 8:44 PM, David Farler dfar...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2014, at 17:10, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
In particular see Maciej's response in
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2011-December/018865.html.
From the second e-mail:
In
On Jul 9, 2014, at 7:46 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
What things need to be done in addition to using 'webkitbot rollout’ to meet
a sufficient standard of notification? I assume based on your comments
Could we teach webkitbot to do an appropriate notification with a waiting
period? Either as part of rollout or add a new command to do it.
- Maciej
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Yes. The point is to do these things before telling webkitbot to rollout a
On Jul 9, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 9, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Again, im not requesting anything new here. The consensus on webkit-dev has
been to ping
In fairness I should note that enabling by default in nightlies doesn’t
necessarily mean anyone will ship it right away. But it’s still a good thing to
do to get better test coverage.
- Maciej
On Jul 1, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
The barrier on entry is
On Jun 19, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2014, at 5:27 AM, pulkomandy pulkoma...@gmail.com wrote:
Should existing WebKit ports that are WK1 based consider switching to WK2?
Yes.
WK1 will be around for the foreseeable future because, on both Mac and
On Jun 10, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Jer Noble jer.no...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote:
I'm looking into EME and something I've been asked to investigate is
Microsoft's proposed CDMi interface, and if we could use it in WebKit. The
idea
On Jun 10, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote:
On 06/10/2014 12:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
But I don’t think we’d want to support pluggable CDMs as an extension point
on any of Apple’s ports (which is the whole point of CDMi), only the ones we
support
If we propose a way for web apps to detect the platform focus cycle behavior,
it should be proposed as a standard.
I would not want to add a proprietary eternally vendor-prefixed feature just
for this.
Regards,
Maciej
On May 12, 2014, at 6:44 PM, James Craig jcr...@apple.com wrote:
WebKit
On Apr 20, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
Won’t compile:
if (!MAYBE_DEFINED) {
…
}
if (SOMETHING) {
void doSomething() { }
}
if (SOMETHING) {
#include “Something.h
}
Will result in unintended behavior:
if (!FOO) {
…
#define BAR
On Apr 20, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
It’s also not possible to determine from context alone whether #if or if
should be used. When #if is used to remove members or functions you’re then
forced to use #if, rather than if, around all uses of those members or
On Mar 16, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote:
On 16.03.2014, at 16:10, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 2014, at 3:01 AM, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote:
a) Invoke make on DerivedSources.make and add a lot of custom target for
that to
On Mar 16, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote:
On 16.03.2014, at 18:50, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
This discussion about DerivedSources is too abstract for me.
If the only thing that DerivedSources.make looks for is python, perl, and
ruby, then
On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Bem Jones-Bey bjone...@adobe.com wrote:
Thanks, Adam. We hope that we will be successful implementing shadow DOM as
well.
Do you have any more specific pointers that Ryosuke et al could look at for
the O(N^2) algorithm? Like a commit range or a function to
On Feb 18, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Hi Ryosuke,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Now that we've removed all of the existing shadow DOM implementations from
trunk in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/164131, I'm intending to
On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
Can't we add a compile time flag instead?
The chromium patch you linked is inelegant and it touches some hot paths.
Another advantage of compile time flag is Andreas eventually notice when they
become useless and
On Feb 11, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On 2/11/14, 9:26 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org
wrote:
Can't we add a compile time flag instead? The chromium patch you
linked is inelegant
On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm sending this to the list because it might affect different
components inside the project.
So as smfr correctly reported here[1] for all those features that don't
have a feature flag (like grid
ENABLE(DECELERATED_COMPOSITING)
On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
If we can’t drop the non-accelerated-compositing mode immediately, I think
that non-accelerated-compositing should be the one that is treated as an
exception and be renamed to use the word
Hi everyone,
I would like to implement the URL API from the WHATWG URL spec, described here:
http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#api
I have a preliminary patch (not ready for review yet; needs tests and fixing
build on other platforms) here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127795
The patch
Ideally it should be USE(THE_SPECIFIC_FRAMEWORK_IN_QUESTION). I would guess
that much of PLATFORM(MAC) that is valid for both Mac and iOS should actually
be USE(FOUNDATION). PLATFORM really shouldn't be used for things other than
terminal platform names. USE(COCOA) would be an ok stopgap if
On Jan 11, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Ideally it should be USE(THE_SPECIFIC_FRAMEWORK_IN_QUESTION). I would guess
that much of PLATFORM(MAC) that is valid for both Mac and iOS should
On Jan 6, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
FunctionParameters::FunctionParameters(ParameterNode* firstParameter,
unsigned size)
: m_size(size)
{
unsigned i = 0;
for (ParameterNode*
On Jan 4, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Alex Christensen alex.christen...@flexsim.com
wrote:
Call me an extremist, but I would be in favor of a complete ban on auto.
I'm not totally sold on using it almost everywhere, but auto is clearly a win
for types that are obnoxiously long to spell but rarely
On Jan 3, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
It might also cover smart pointer usage like your example and multiline
expansions of setSize(foo-size()).
- Use auto when type is obvious for people with basic familiarity with a
subsystem:
auto style =
On Jan 2, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
I think that this article is one of many great examples of arguments in favor
of less explicit typing. These lines of reasoning are often used by
proponents of both dynamic languages (like Ruby) and type-inferred languages
If we comprehensively deploy smart pointers in place of raw pointers and manual
memory management, then yes.
The render tree does have places where non-owning references are held, and
these can be some of the biggest security risks. One notable example is the
m_floats member in
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Timothy Hatcher timo...@apple.com wrote:
As I replied before, there should only be one attribute — srcset.
I have a serious suggestion - could we rename srcset to src-n
(literally,
On Nov 8, 2013, at 9:06 AM, John Mellor joh...@chromium.org wrote:
Most discussion so far seems to be bikeshedding the syntax. To make this more
productive, can we focus on the core issues?
srcN brings two things to the table, compared to srcset:
1. It handles viewport-switching better
On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Timothy Hatcher timo...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
srcset's parsing algorithm *cannot* be extended in the future. I gave
an
On Oct 22, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
My initial impression is that it seems a bit overengineered.
Can you elaborate on these concerns?
- The syntax is effectively a list of lists
My initial impression is that it seems a bit overengineered.
- Maciej
On Oct 19, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Yoav Weiss y...@yoav.ws wrote:
Hello WebKiteers,
I'd like to get the project's opinion on a recent responsive image proposal
by Tab Atkins dubbed srcN:
These days, pure JavaScript tests won't do a lot of malloc() calls, so it's
more relevant to try a page load speed or DOM benchmark.
- Maciej
On Oct 4, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Osztrogonác Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Hi,
As Zoltan said this feature was introduced for Qt port. But now
On Oct 2, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
02.10.2013, 03:18, Zoltan Horvath zol...@webkit.org:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
So are you proposing to use the system allocator on Windows?
I’m proposing a two step
On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Andy Wingo wi...@igalia.com wrote:
We need somebody to resolve these issues, otherwise our memory
footprint will be unacceptably high, and/or our VM operations will be
unacceptably slow.
There is no memory footprint problem caused by mmap here -- to my
On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Hi folks.
I’m planning to remove our years-out-of-date port of TCMalloc, and replace it
with something that takes maximum advantage of Mac and iOS virtual memory,
threading, and security APIs.
I've heard that TCMalloc
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@apple.com wrote:
So are you proposing to use the system allocator on Windows? Or would we keep
using the existing FastMalloc implementation?
The current malloc logic has been the source of a number of mysterious
crashes on Windows, so
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
(3) Find a fast thread-specific data API on the canonical GTK platform.
Threading for GTK+ on non-Mac/non-Windows platforms is essentially
pthreads.
To access thread-specific data using pthreads, you first need to take a
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
(4) Find a fast API for aligned virtual memory allocation.
(5) Find a fast API for committing / decommitting physical memory without
releasing virtual memory pages.
Hrm. Isn't this already available via OSAllocator or are
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
To access thread-specific data using pthreads, you first need to take a
lock and call pthread_key_create(). Since the whole point of
thread-specific data is to avoid taking a lock, the API is useless.
The normal way to do
Sounds ok to add it prefixed.
- Maciej
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:53 PM, James Craig jcr...@apple.com wrote:
Follow-up question: Since this hasn’t made it into the CSS4 spec yet, should
we temporarily use “-webkit-alt” for the property name? I know there has been
a push to move away from
I also don't think it should be added to WebKit.
In addition to other reasons stated, the spec has obvious severe security risks
which are not adequately addressed by a permissions dialog.
Section 7 of the spec allows a webpage to bypass the same-origin security model
to communicate with
Is the implementation likely to be correct enough that we wouldn't risk locking
in buggy behavior?
- Maciej
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Simon Fraser simon.fra...@apple.com wrote:
Support for CSS object-fit has landed in Blink (runtime-enabled)[1] and I’d
like to land it in WebKit[2].
From the new format, I like the shorter bug URL and the angle brackets, but I
don't care much either way about putting the bug URL and title on the same
line.
One downside though is that, if you're composing a ChangeLog more manually,
it's more awkward to construct the new-style URL since you
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2013-08-22, at 12:46 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos carlo...@webkit.org wrote:
El jue, 22-08-2013 a las 00:41 -0700, Mark Rowe escribió:
On 2013-08-21, at 11:11 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos carlo...@webkit.org
wrote:
I see, I
On Jul 12, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that we have media source API implemented under
Source/WebCore/Modules/mediasource/ behind MEDIA_SOURCE build flag.
There has been patches like
On Jul 1, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I concur. Maybe
StyleResolver* styleResolverIfExists()
StyleResolver styleResolver()
?
I concur with this.
For this entire discussion, this is where
On Jun 19, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Andreas Kling akl...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Timothy Hatcher timo...@apple.com wrote:
What about?
StyleResolver* existingStyleResolver()
StyleResolver
On Jun 18, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Simon Fraser simon.fra...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Why don't we
If the semantic is essentially that of a getter that just happens to lazily
create what it gets on demand, then I don't think require or required is
needed. It can just be named as a getter. If the side effect is very important
and especially if clients ever call the function only for its side
Sounds good to me.
- Maciej
On Jun 17, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Kangil Han kangil@samsung.com wrote:
Hi webkit-dev!
I wanted to let you know that I plan to add document.currentScript attribute
support to WebKit.
At this moment, it’s been supported in chrome and firefox.
You can find
On Jun 2, 2013, at 3:49 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
You guys obviously never wrote any Lisp code.
Um, why do you think I suggested
On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
You guys obviously never wrote any Lisp code.
Um, why do you think I suggested Symbol?
On Jun 1, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
Seriously, if Atomic isn't jargon, Intern isn't either.
Both are jargon.
On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 31, 2013, at 8:01 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
One thing that always threw me was the term Atomic in the class name. I
wonder if the term InternedString would make it usage more apparent.
I personally love
We could probably phase out TreeShared if we were really careful to avoid
refcount thrash during tree construction/manipulation. I believe this can be
done with careful use of PassRefPtr and swap() and it would likely be easier to
understand if Nodes normally had a refcount of 1 instead of 0.
On May 21, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Mario Sanchez Prada mario.pr...@samsung.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Following the discussion in the contributors meeting about layering
violations I was thinking about moving all the accessibility stuff inside
WebCore/accessibility into a new
On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Anders Carlsson ander...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Hi Mikhail.
In continuation of the topic I'd like also to know people's opinion about
Pass*Ptr types deprecation:
I don't think this is
On Apr 22, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2013, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Seems like a reasonable feature to add.
Would you mind also reviewing the patch in question then or help me find a
reviewer with the right knowledge? Most
This isn't really a proper forum for this question. This list is for
development of WebKit, not discussing the contents of specific vendor releases.
For more information on this specific question, you can look at Apple's release
notes for 5.1.8, or contact Apple Developer Relations.
- Maciej
On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Timothy Hatcher timo...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Bear Travis betra...@adobe.com wrote:
What do folks think about adding a mechanism for users to toggle features
like this on in WebKit nightlies? I don't have a definite approach yet, but
Is this behavior change likely to affect any existing Web content, or other
important content that uses html ruby markup such as books in EPUB format?
- Maciej
On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Yuki Sekiguchi
yuki.sekigu...@access-company.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to add support for
On Apr 16, 2013, at 5:08 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
Hi webkit-dev
I have recently uploaded a new patch to
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18930 to implement mouseenter and
mouseleave events.
These events are part of DOM3
On Apr 15, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
Those of you who are subscribed to blink-dev@ will see that I just sent out a
note entitled Blink, Testing and the W3C, describing stuff I'm working on
to get the W3C tests running regularly as part of the
On Apr 12, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
You have all of the same problems as with threads and locks. The two are
logically equivalent. You can imagine a lock as being a message queue that
always has a token in it when the lock is unlocked, and the token is read
On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote:
Of course, I understand that. But there is a huge opportunity cost to webkit.
The c++11 standard also rewrites the entire standard library. I have been
using
g++ 4.7.2 using -stdc++11 in my work with linux. And
On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls jarred.nicho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Victor Costan cos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear WebKit devs,
I would like to make console.log and related functions work without
requiring that this is set to the console object. This would make
debugging from Web Inspector easier, because console.log could be
As a person who does not know any of Perl, Python or Ruby very well, I find
unfamiliar Python the easiest to understand (even though I have more experience
with Perl). I feel this would be worthwhile, if not necessarily a top priority.
I do hope that this could be done without undue increase
On Apr 7, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Dirk Schulze k...@webkit.org wrote:
The recent request from Andreas to remove CSS Variables leads to the question
if there are more features that are not maintained at the moment.
I
On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Michelangelo De Simone micde...@gmail.com wrote:
[Moved/Reposted to WebKit-Dev]
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@chromium.org wrote:
What about adding a NeedsOwner keyword to orphan feature bugs,
marking them RESOLVED/LATER?
I would be
On Apr 7, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Timothy Hatcher timo...@apple.com wrote:
I think 6 months is fine for deactivating SVN accounts. And a full revoke of
reviewer status after 2 years of no activity sounds reasonable to me.
On Apr 4, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Hi,
This is somewhat related to the bulk move of Chromium-WebKit contributors to
Blink, but we might want to consider sunsetting/expiring committership and
reviewership.
I'm thinking of something like expiring
On Apr 5, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Mario Sanchez Prada mario.pr...@samsung.com wrote:
Also, my mail was not really a formal request to keep the V8 bits around in
the long term, but just a quick reply to the following comment from Maciej:
Geoff posted the list in part because we'd like to
On Apr 4, 2013, at 1:39 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Hi folks.
Since we no longer need to support the Chromium port, let's take the
opportunity to streamline. Hopefully, this will make development easier
and more
201 - 300 of 1378 matches
Mail list logo
