On Aug 31, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
...Yes, I did the Google search and you're right that the
On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
But I agree with Maciej that all of the public API is transformation
oriented. Even things like inverse() and transpose() have application in
doing transforms. I think it would be a stretch to use this 4x4 matrix for
general purposes. A
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
But I agree with Maciej that all of the public API is transformation
oriented. Even
I just noticed these classes, added 7 months ago as part of Chris Rogers' audio
work. I think it's a mistake to have these in WTF for a few reasons:
1) Complex is just std::complex with a single added function,
complexFromMagnitudePhase(), which seems pretty audio specific, so it should go
On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Or should we get rid of Vector3, added the functionality it needs to
FloatPoint3D and use that? Ken Russell already has plans to do add the
functions to FloatPoint3D, so I would vote for that.
I would vote for this. I don't think the
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Or should we get rid of Vector3, added the functionality it needs to
FloatPoint3D and use that? Ken Russell already has plans to do add the
functions to FloatPoint3D, so I
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Or should we get rid of Vector3, added the functionality it needs
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Or
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Maciej
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
...Yes, I did the Google search and you're right that the term is not in
common usage (although I still maintain it's a completely reasonable term).
The reason I think it's meaningful is because it really is a matrix of
sorts, but a
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
...Yes, I did the Google search and you're right that the term is not in
common usage (although I still maintain it's a completely reasonable
term). The reason I think it's meaningful
14 matches
Mail list logo
