From: aba...@webkit.org
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:33:57 -0700
To: m...@apple.com
CC: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] HTML5 MathML3 entities
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jul 10
My aim was not to rush.
I'm currently looking at what needs to be implemented in WebKit to support
MathML 3.
I noticed that a lot of entities are not implemented and I first thought it was
easy to implement.
After this discussion on the mailing list, it appears not to be so simple.
I filled a
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Sausset François wrote:
I just saw that when looking at the code by myself.
What do you exactly mean by a prefix tree?
The data structure commonly called a Trie is a prefix tree:
I'm currently working on the MathML3 implementation and I noticed that new XML
entities have been defined by the W3C:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/
They are supposed to be used by both HTML 5 MathML 3.
I would like to include them in WebCore/html/HTMLEntityNames.gperf.
However there
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Sausset François wrote:
I'm currently working on the MathML3 implementation and I noticed that new
XML entities have been defined by the W3C:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/
They are supposed to be used by both HTML 5 MathML 3.
I would like to
10.07.2010, в 04:49, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
Go with the HTML5 / MathML 3 definitions for everything. Our XHTML
implementation targets XHTML5, not XHTML 1.0.
I think that xml-entity-names and HTML5 made a poor choice changing the
semantics of rang; and lang; (they used to be CJK
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Sausset François wrote:
I'm currently working on the MathML3 implementation and I noticed that new
XML entities have been defined by the W3C:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/
They are
I just saw that when looking at the code by myself.
What do you exactly mean by a prefix tree?
I also noticed that the entity parser does not take into account combined
Unicode characters (see §A.3 in: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/).
In addition, even without entities, combined
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Sausset François saus...@gmail.com wrote:
I just saw that when looking at the code by myself.
What do you exactly mean by a prefix tree?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie
I also noticed that the entity parser does not take into account combined
Unicode
I'm not sure to understand everything, but the given link doesn't deal with the
case where an entity should be translated to 2 Unicode characters, instead of
only one as it is the case with the current hash table system.
Such 2 characters entities don't exist in the HTML 5 entity list, but some
On Jul 10, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
10.07.2010, в 04:49, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
Go with the HTML5 / MathML 3 definitions for everything. Our XHTML
implementation targets XHTML5, not XHTML 1.0.
I think that xml-entity-names and HTML5 made a poor choice
On Jul 10, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Sausset François wrote:
I just saw that when looking at the code by myself.
What do you exactly mean by a prefix tree?
The data structure commonly called a Trie is a prefix tree:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie
This data structure not only lets you tell if a
12 matches
Mail list logo
