I agree that NetworkingContext is cleaner than a direct Frame association.
I'm concerned though about the idea of network requests that are not
associated with a Page. Associating network requests with a Page is
important so that you know how to show UI (auth prompt, cookie prompt, ssl
error
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't understand. WebWorkers use ThreadableLoader, which routes the
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
I
I like Adam's thinking on this. ResourceHandle depending on Frame, even
indirectly, is something of a layering violation. It makes more sense to factor
out the bits that it does need, a la NetworkContext. Using client methods to
make an association externally seems ok too, but poses more risk
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
For example, you
cannot load any network requests in Chromium unless you
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
I
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Having fake versions of objects add complexity to all the code that
expects to talk to real versions of those objects. For example,
SVG-in-img creates
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Having fake versions of objects add complexity to all the code that
expects to
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
There are are lots of ways to get a Frameless document. For example,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:43 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Having
I don't mean to spam this list with design questions, but I'm trying
to wrap my mind around how the loader is put together today and how
we'd like it to be put together in the future.
There's a FIXME in ResourceHandle that says that ResourceHandle
shouldn't depend on Frame. (For those who aren't
On 09/11/2010 05:57 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
Do we still believe this FIXME is accurate? If so, I have some time
next week to look at removing the dependency. There's a patch that
either recently landed or is about to land that furthers the use of
Frame by ResourceHandle, so I wanted to check
It seems the dependency on Frame is now gone (as of last night I guess?)
with the advent of the NetworkingContext.
-Sam
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 2:57 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
I don't mean to spam this list with design
Excellent. :)
Adam
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Sam Weinig sam.wei...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the dependency on Frame is now gone (as of last night I guess?)
with the advent of the NetworkingContext.
-Sam
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On
On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
It seems the dependency on Frame is now gone (as of last night I guess?) with
the advent of the NetworkingContext.
Neat. I was going to suggest using factory objects to create ResourceHandles
(then they can stuff in whatever info they need, or
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Holger Freyther ze...@selfish.org
wrote:
On 09/11/2010 05:57 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
Do we still believe this FIXME is accurate? If so, I have some time
next week to look at removing the
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Holger Freyther ze...@selfish.org
wrote:
On 09/11/2010 05:57 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
Do we still believe this FIXME is
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Holger Freyther ze...@selfish.org
wrote:
18 matches
Mail list logo
