On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:01:17 -0800
Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Getting this right with the approach you seem to be taking is
extremely difficult. The problem is not that the local script is
untrustworthy. The problem is that the web page it's interacting with
might be able to steal
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:01:17 -0800
Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Getting this right with the approach you seem to be taking is
extremely difficult. The problem is not that the local script is
untrustworthy.
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:01:19 -0800
Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:01:17 -0800
Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Getting this right with the approach you seem to be taking is
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
I guess we can only wait for isolatedworlds to appear in the gtk+
port :)
I suspect they would welcome patches. (They should be pretty easy patches.) :)
Adam
___
Getting this right with the approach you seem to be taking is
extremely difficult. The problem is not that the local script is
untrustworthy. The problem is that the web page it's interacting with
might be able to steal its privileges.
Isolated worlds should be implemented in webkitgtk+ thanks
5 matches
Mail list logo
