Here are some things that may help;
*#1 svn server overloading when all the slaves bootstrap at the same time*
The only good work around is to keep an internal read-only svn-mirror that
the slaves use instead of the real svn server.
This means that builds must be triggered on the svn-mirror,
Hi,
Marc-Antoine Ruel írta:
Here are some things that may help;
*#1 svn server overloading when all the slaves bootstrap at the same time*
The only good work around is to keep an internal read-only svn-mirror
that the slaves use instead of the real svn server.
This means that builds must be
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
do svnsync on the mirror svn server if we finished setting up the server?
How would you want svn.webkit.org to signal the mirror? I think having
svn.webkit.org
Hi,
William Siegrist írta:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
do svnsync on the mirror svn server if we finished setting up the server?
How would you want svn.webkit.org to signal the mirror? I think
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Hi,
William Siegrist írta:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
And one more technical question. Could you add an svn post-commit hook to
do svnsync on the mirror svn server if we finished setting up
On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:13 AM, William Siegrist wsiegr...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Hi,
William Siegrist írta:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
And one more technical question. Could you add an svn
William Siegrist írta:
The Szeged slaves are unblocked.
-Bill
Many thanks, I copied up-to-date svn working copy to them and then started.
I have only one more little request. Could you kick git.webkit.org too? It
seems it is still stay on r109303. Our EWS would be happy if it works again.
On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote:
William Siegrist írta:
The Szeged slaves are unblocked. -Bill
Many thanks, I copied up-to-date svn working copy to them and then started.
I have only one more little request. Could you kick git.webkit.org too? It
Hi,
git.webkit.org is behind svn.webkit.org again. :(
r109205 is the latest svn commit, but r109202 in git.
Unfortunately I can't commit to svn because this problem.
Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn?
I set up my git svn repo about
Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn?
I set up my git svn repo about
$http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit :
- git clone git://git.webkit.org/WebKit.git WebKit
- git svn init --prefix=origin/ -T trunk
http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit
- git config --replace
This should be fixed now.
-Bill
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:19 AM, David Barr wrote:
Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn?
I set up my git svn repo about
$http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit :
- git clone git://git.webkit.org/WebKit.git WebKit
- git svn init
Hi Bill,
Would it be possible to get some more information on your/Lucas' plans on
improving stability of the infrastructure? This was the third significant
interruption within a week, and especially for us non-PST folks it's
becoming quite inconvenient.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at
Hi Lucas,
Thank you very much for your answer!
One change that was applied to Chromium's build bot console[1] recently was
to cache the overview page for a minute. This may be relevant to the
Apache caching layer you mentioned. If requests are really handled
serially then updating to version
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.comwrote:
I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing
some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient in
terms of processing a large number of requests. I believe requests are
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.comwrote:
I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After
doing some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient
in
I'm currenlty upgrading build.webkit.org from 0.8.3 to 0.8.5. It should be
back online shortly.
Lucas
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com
wrote:
I am looking into improving performance of
build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
Thanks for your patience!
Lucas
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Lucas Forschler wrote:
I'm currenlty upgrading build.webkit.org from 0.8.3 to 0.8.5. It should be
back online shortly.
Lucas
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote:
build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
Thanks for your patience!
For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone actually
made build.webkit.org substantially slower. After profiling
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote:
build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
Thanks for your patience!
For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone
On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote:
build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5.
Thanks for your patience!
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote:
build.webkit.org should be back online
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:33 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com
We're back to the slaves overloading svn. The Apple slaves are blocked
temporarily while everyone else catches up. Sorry for the inconvenience.
-Bill
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
