Re: [webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

2012-03-01 Thread David Kilzer
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: In my view, I would actually rather upload the combination of committed + staged + unstaged changes rather than be told I have to commit things; in other words, I actually prefer to commit what I've uploaded rather than upload what I've

Re: [webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

2012-03-01 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:43 AM, David Kilzer ddkil...@webkit.org wrote: On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: In my view, I would actually rather upload the combination of committed + staged + unstaged changes rather than be told I have to commit things; in other words, I actually

[webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

2012-02-29 Thread Shawn Singh
Quote from the discussion: that's why I said that having something like webkit-patch upload range_of_commits will be nice to have, as you wouldn't have to create a new branch and rebase several commits, just to upload a new patch to the bz. You can do this with the current -g option by

Re: [webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

2012-02-29 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Shawn Singh shawnsi...@chromium.org wrote: Quote from the discussion: that's why I said that having something like webkit-patch upload range_of_commits will be nice to have, as you wouldn't have to create a new branch and rebase several commits, just to

Re: [webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

2012-02-29 Thread Shawn Singh
Awesome thanks very much. =) Yeah, the way you proposed to deal with it seems better, now I think of it. ~Shawn On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Shawn Singh shawnsi...@google.com wrote: Awesome thanks very much. =) Yeah, the way you proposed to deal with it seems better, now I think