Re: [webkit-dev] Should we put the webkit.org mailing lists on Gmane?

2009-12-15 Thread Adam Roben
On Dec 14, 2009, at 10:09 PM, David Kilzer wrote: On Mon, December 14, 2009 at 6:47:50 PM, Adam Roben wrote: On Jun 13, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Adam Roben wrote: I think it would be good to put our mailing lists on Gmane (including importing the archives of the lists). The lists are now all

Re: [webkit-dev] JIT on Windows CE

2009-12-15 Thread Jason Rukman
Hi İsmail, I’ve tried to get JIT working a couple of times on our wince build but with limited success. There’s some strangeness going on with the crossover of arguments from the wince compiler toolchain through to the JIT code (probably with the stack frame or something like that). My

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedScript: next steps and result of offline discussion.

2009-12-15 Thread Michael Nordman
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: I think that use case has been de-emphasized. However, if we wanted to support it, we'd probably have to say that removeChild of an IFRAME element doesn't cause the unload event to be dispatched. (I'm a bit concerned

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedScript: next steps and result of offline discussion.

2009-12-15 Thread Darin Fisher
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: I think that use case has been de-emphasized. However, if we wanted to support it, we'd probably have to say that removeChild of an IFRAME

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedScript: next steps and result of offline discussion.

2009-12-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Michael Nordman wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: I think that use case has been de-emphasized. However, if we wanted to support it, we'd probably have to say that removeChild of an IFRAME element doesn't cause

[webkit-dev] QtConnectionObjects not cleaned up for QtOwnership objects

2009-12-15 Thread Andrew Webster
For all the Qt people out there, here is my problem: We have quite a few QObjects that we are inserting into JavaScript using addToJavaScriptWindowObject, however because we have limited resources and are creating so many of these objects, we would prefer that they are NOT ScriptOwnership objects

Re: [webkit-dev] Sunspider 0.9.1 preview

2009-12-15 Thread Mike Belshe
[+cc John Resig since he's using this as part of dromaeo] Overall, sounds like good progress. A couple of ideas: - can we make it so that if you try to cut-and-paste comparisons of 0.9 to 0.9.1 results, it will say these results are from a different version? - can we make the version more

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedScript: next steps and result of offline discussion.

2009-12-15 Thread Michael Nordman
Saving a subsite of live script and DOM objects across a full page load does not seem useful to me Lots of sites use actual frame navigations to navigate. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Michael Nordman wrote: On

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedScript: next steps and result of offline discussion.

2009-12-15 Thread Dmitry Titov
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Michael Nordman wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: I think that use case has been de-emphasized. However, if we wanted to support it, we'd

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedScript: next steps and result of offline discussion.

2009-12-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Dmitry Titov wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Michael Nordman wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: I think that use case has been

Re: [webkit-dev] QtConnectionObjects not cleaned up for QtOwnership objects

2009-12-15 Thread Kenneth Christiansen
This should go to the webkit...@lists.webkit.org list instead. Please repost there. Creating a bug report on bugs.webkit.org for tracking your issues is another welcome option. Kenneth On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Webster apwebs...@gmail.com wrote: For all the Qt people out there,

Re: [webkit-dev] Sunspider 0.9.1 preview

2009-12-15 Thread Mike Belshe
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: [+cc John Resig since he's using this as part of dromaeo] Overall, sounds like good progress. A couple of ideas: - can we make it so that if you try to

Re: [webkit-dev] Sunspider 0.9.1 preview

2009-12-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: A couple of ideas: - can we make it so that if you try to cut-and-paste comparisons of 0.9 to 0.9.1 results, it will say these results are from a different version? Good idea.

Re: [webkit-dev] Sunspider 0.9.1 preview

2009-12-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Dec 15, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: - what would you think of reducing the setTimeout(..., 500) to something like setTimeout(..., 100)? This will cut the runtime of the test by ~80% :-) I