Hi Adam,
I raised the bug .
It is reachable through link https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68789
Regards,
Swapna
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 23, 2011, at 9:36 AM, vswap 65 wrote:
After little more investigation I found that the
This isn't the right mailing list for a question like this.
http://www.webkit.org/contact.html explains the different mailing lists.
But probably the best thing to do in a case like this is to file a bug at
http://webkit.org/new-bug.
-Adam
___
FWIW, Opera is planning to ship this unprefixed.
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/microdata-and-the-microdata-dom-api/
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
This problem appears to be a duplicate of:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61452
I have annotated that bug report with a few additional comments.
Thanks to David Brown for his help with this.
--
View this message in context:
In the wake of Geoff's work to simplify threading ifdefs, and Adam's review of
supported ports, I'm curious what people think about maintaining many platform
branches in our WTF and JavaScriptCore threading code.
Right now, it feels rather non-systemic, with some code built upon pthreads, Qt
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
In the wake of Geoff's work to simplify threading ifdefs, and Adam's review
of supported ports, I'm curious what people think about maintaining many
platform branches in our WTF and JavaScriptCore threading code.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
In the wake of Geoff's work to simplify threading ifdefs, and Adam's review
of supported ports, I'm curious what people think about maintaining many
platform branches in our WTF and JavaScriptCore threading code.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:08:41 -0400, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
Do we want to require that platforms support pthreads, so that code
that isn't performance critical could have just one implementation?
That's the status quo :) MachineStackMarker only works with
pthreads, so QtWin32 and Win ports
Do we want to require that platforms support pthreads, so that code that
isn't performance critical could have just one implementation?
It might work to require either POSIX threads or Win32 threads in all build
configurations, and refactor or remove other threading code.
It's a bit weird to
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:20 AM, James Robinson wrote:
The TIMER based support for RAF is very new (only a few weeks old) and
still has several major bugs. I'd suggest letting it bake for a bit before
considering turning it on
10 matches
Mail list logo
