On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Adam Roben aro...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Can we do some Bugzilla integration as Jarred suggested?
If you're excited about
Tor,
I think we should retire the author rewriting script on GitHub.
Jame's is right that there's a lot of value in having git.webkit.org
and GitHub using the same hashes. For example, both Eric and Gavin
requested that when they started using GitHub.
We would have some trouble adopting the
I read https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures, but I'm
still unsure how to proceed with removing webkitPostMessage and
aligning postMessage with the spec. No one responded to my earlier
message, so I'm inclined to just post a patch.
Many thanks,
Adam
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:08 PM,
wrt #1, I believe that postMessage implements what is in the spec and
webkitPostMessage additional has support for ArrayBuffers which wasn't in
the postMessage spec yet but was going to be added. If the behaviors from
webkitPostMessage were added to postMessage, then it coudl be removed.
wrt #2,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:15 AM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
wrt #1, I believe that postMessage implements what is in the spec and
webkitPostMessage additional has support for ArrayBuffers which wasn't in
the postMessage spec yet but was going to be added. If the behaviors from
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I read https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures, but I'm
still unsure how to proceed with removing webkitPostMessage and
aligning postMessage with the spec. No one responded to my earlier
message, so I'm inclined to
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
BTW, the page at https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures seems to
be using deprecate in the sense of remove entirely. Is that what is
meant? If so, I think it would be helpful to change the wording to removing
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I read https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures, but I'm
still unsure how to proceed with removing webkitPostMessage and
aligning postMessage
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I read https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures, but I'm
still unsure how to proceed with removing webkitPostMessage and
aligning postMessage with
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
BTW, the page at https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures seems
to be using deprecate in the sense of remove entirely. Is that what is
On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I read https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures, but I'm
still unsure how to
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
BTW, the page at https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures seems
to be
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
BTW,
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 27,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I read
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
There is very little cost on the WebKit project to maintain webkitPostMessage
in addition to postMessage. Instead, supporting webkitPostMessage imposes a
cost on the web platform at large by reducing interoperability
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm actually curious as to how the session participants reached this
consensus (probably on a separate thread). It seems like the bar shouldn't
too high for removing prefixed APIs when they are unprefixed equivalents
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwarn...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm actually curious as to how the session participants reached this consensus
(probably on a separate thread). It seems like the bar shouldn't too high for
removing prefixed APIs when they are
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Nat Duca nd...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm concerned at how well this would work graphics performance tests.
Consider:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110111083848/http://techcrunch.com/
http://web.archive.org/web/20110222032916/http://www.nytimes.com/
Hi folks,
new-run-webkit-tests seems to mess with the system color profile on Mac, even
when not running pixel tests. Historically, I believe we did this only when
running pixel tests. I noticed that this is because it launches the
LayoutTestHelper tool unconditionally, and in addition to
On Apr 29, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Hi folks,
new-run-webkit-tests seems to mess with the system color profile on Mac, even
when not running pixel tests. Historically, I believe we did this only when
running pixel tests. I noticed that this is because
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
There is very little cost on the WebKit project to maintain
webkitPostMessage in addition to postMessage. Instead, supporting
webkitPostMessage imposes
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
There is very little cost on the WebKit project to maintain
webkitPostMessage in
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I think the relevant question is how much (if any) content uses
webkitPostMessage (without unprefixed postMessage fallback). The fact that
postMessage incorporates the new functionality doesn't answer that question.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.comwrote:
On Apr
25 matches
Mail list logo
