Hi all,
I have a query regarding addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry API in
SecurityOrigin.cpp. Is there any special requirement in the
sourceOrigin argument of this API when the scheme of the sourceOrigin
is already added to the localScheme list?
Because if the sourceOrigin is localScheme and the URI
Hello,
Is there a way to debug/visualize the messages passed between the WebProcess
and the UIProcess?
I am debugging an issue on page loading and it is made a bit difficult by
the passage back and forth between the two processses. I wonder if there is
better way to do that.
cheers,
Benjamin
I'm trying to add a setting to enable/disable WebSockets at runtime (so that
the browser can make websockets available as a user preference, for instance).
It's easy to add a flag to Settings, and check it from
JSDOMWindowCustom::webSocket to return undefined for the websocket object when
The RuntimeEnabledFeatures class [1] seems like what you're looking for.
J
[1]
http://codesearch.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#OAMlx_jo-ck/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/bindings/generic/RuntimeEnabledFeatures.hq=RuntimeFeatureexact_package=chromiumd=6
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Joe Mason
Aha, there is already a websocketsEnabled method there! Thanks, that's
perfect.
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:25 PM
To: Joe Mason
Cc: webkit-dev Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Getting at Settings object
Hmm, I can't get the RuntimeEnabledFeatures class working.
bool RuntimeEnabledFeatures::webSocketEnabled()
{
return WebSocket::isAvailable();
}
So it looks from that like I should just be able to call
WebSocket::setIsAvailable(false), and then websockets would automatically drop
out. But
Hmm. It might still be v8-only, though I'm surprised since the class was
moved from the v8 directory to generic. If that's the case, then I suppose
it'll need to be ported to JSC.
J
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Joe Mason jma...@rim.com wrote:
Hmm, I can’t get the RuntimeEnabledFeatures
Btw, the reason that this behavior has to live in the bindings and not
WebCore is to ensure feature detection code still works. For example, if
indexedDB is disabled at runtime, then the webkitIndexedDB attribute on
window needs to not exist in any form.
Also, IIRC, because of optimizations, the
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Pushparajan V vpra...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a query regarding addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry API in
SecurityOrigin.cpp. Is there any special requirement in the
sourceOrigin argument of this API when the scheme of the sourceOrigin
is already added to the
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port this
over. I have no idea where to start... The structure of CodeGeneratorJS.pm
and CodeGeneratorV8.pm seem quite different. This also seems like a lot of
work to do just to enable/disable one feature, but I guess if
On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port this
over. I have no idea where to start… The structure of CodeGeneratorJS.pm and
CodeGeneratorV8.pm seem quite different. This also seems like a lot of work
to do just to
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port this
over. I have no idea where to start… The structure of CodeGeneratorJS.pm
and CodeGeneratorV8.pm seem
-Original Message-
From: aba...@gmail.com [mailto:aba...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adam
Barth
That's one my list of things I'd like to do, but my Perl isn't strong
enough yet. :(
I'm pretty sure my Perl is worse than yours, unfortunately. Perl and I do not
get along.
I've filed
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port
this over. I have no idea where to
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port
this over. I have no idea where to start… The structure of
CodeGeneratorJS.pm and CodeGeneratorV8.pm
From: da...@google.com [mailto:da...@google.com] On Behalf Of Darin Fisher
IIRC, there was not much interest from JSC-using ports
for RuntimeEnabledFeatures.
Well, there is now!
Joe
-
This transmission (including any
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
The user agent string in Chromium cites, for example,
AppleWebKit/534.10. Does this refer directly to the /tags/Safari-534.10
code base? In other words, this is just an example of an organization
chosing to use a tag created
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
The user agent string in Chromium cites, for example,
AppleWebKit/534.10. Does this refer directly to the /tags/Safari-534.10
code base? In other words,
Hi,
I am doing some refactoring in WebGL, and it will touch almost every
function in WebGLRenderingContext and other classes start with WebGL*
under WebCore/html/canvas.
Can I ask that for next Monday and Tuesday, do not touch these files
until my patch lands?
Otherwise merge will be a big
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Some ideas:
-Use the svn revision number. That has the downside of being tied to SVN
should we want to change version control systems.
-Have a file
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Pushparajan V vpra...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a query regarding addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry API in
SecurityOrigin.cpp. Is there any special requirement in the
sourceOrigin argument of this API
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Pushparajan V vpra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Pushparajan V vpra...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a query regarding addOriginAccessWhitelistEntry API in
SecurityOrigin.cpp.
23 matches
Mail list logo
