You can't store much data in cookies and thus you're only shooting yourself
in the foot with a bb gun. 5mb means you're shooting yourself in the foot
with a real gun. And if you're allowing over 5mb, it's a bazooka.
Anyway, I've written extensively about this many times on many different
lists.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
You can't store much data in cookies and thus you're only shooting yourself
in the foot with a bb gun. 5mb means you're shooting yourself in the foot
with a real gun. And if you're allowing over 5mb, it's a bazooka
Can you please explain why? Its very little overhead and is useful for
tracking regressions and such.
J
On Mar 28, 2011 9:52 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I'd even go a bit further and say that if something is worth a review
(even
/changeset/81864
J
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Can you please explain why? Its very little overhead and is useful for
tracking regressions and such.
J
On Mar 28, 2011 9:52 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2011, at 1:31 AM
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I think it's better to have no exceptions than a very narrow exception.
This seems to be a reason for saying we should always have a bug for
anything that's reviewed...
J
___
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I think it's better to have no exceptions than a very narrow exception.
This seems to be a reason for saying we should always have a bug
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann
zimmerm...@physik.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Am 01.03.2011 um 18:33 schrieb Maciej Stachowiak:
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:18 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
Reducing the number of build systems is a face-meltingly worthy goal. I
have one small question:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
We could quickly find ourselves in the position of generating build files
for many different ports every time we submit patches, which could add
It seems like it'd be nice to be able to watch bugs that are assigned to
someone too though.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
10.02.2011, в 10:58, Darin Fisher написал(а):
What Mozilla does is they set the QA Contact field to an email address of
How hard will the transition be? If it's going to take a lot of time and
cause a lot of churn anyway, would this be a good time to try and make that
port use GYP or CMake? (I assume the answer is probably no, but figured it
was worth asking anyway. :-)
J
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Adam
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
The WOFF font specification requires that browsers apply Same Origin
Restrictions (SOR) to WOFF fonts. So far, Firefox and IE9 follow this
requirement, while we
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ryan Leavengood leaveng...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Mihai Parparita mih...@chromium.org
wrote:
The post is link-heavy (generally into Trac, and
Bugzilla), I'm hoping that would also encourage exploration of the
code/site
by people
The info is on https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit as well.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Philippe Normand pnorm...@igalia.comwrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:26 +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Hi all,
When I'm trying to cherry-pick or rebase something in my WebKit git
The RuntimeEnabledFeatures class [1] seems like what you're looking for.
J
[1]
http://codesearch.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#OAMlx_jo-ck/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/bindings/generic/RuntimeEnabledFeatures.hq=RuntimeFeatureexact_package=chromiumd=6
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Joe Mason
. Is this a V8-only thing?
Joe
*From:* webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:
webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] *On Behalf Of *Joe Mason
*Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:52 PM
*To:* Jeremy Orlow
*Cc:* webkit-dev Development
*Subject:* Re: [webkit-dev] Getting at Settings
:38 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Hmm. It might still be v8-only, though I'm surprised since the class was
moved from the v8 directory to generic. If that's the case, then I suppose
it'll need to be ported to JSC.
J
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Joe Mason jma...@rim.com
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port
this over. I have no idea where to
For what it's worth, on my 12GB of ram mac pro:
$ sudo sysctl -w kern.maxvnodes=384000
kern.maxvnodes: 197632 - 384000
Took times from 2.11-2.06 down to 2.05-2.02. I.e. it made a small
difference, but not much. The 64 bit patch definitely seemed to help, but I
didn't think to time before and
You forgot to mention virtual functions, which is another case where you do
_not_ use WEBKIT_API.
J
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
If you do not work on the Chromium port of WebKit, you can stop reading
now.
I've noticed that there is some confusion
Note that it's still a bit of an open question as to where mocks should live
in general. IIRC, the top candidates are like device orientation and speech
do now, somehow in some central place but not compiled into production
libraries, or in DRT (which means more copied code, but the platform
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jack Allegrezza jackallegre...@mac.comwrote:
Hello,
I am proposing that WebKit have an Enhancements ability - Here is
what the reason is - with abilities of WebKit to draw and handle THML,SVG,
Canvas and Video, along with access to resources via AJAX
Ping?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I don't see a Tiger buildbot anymore. Does that mean I'm allowed to
break the Tiger build? If so, can we rip out all the Tiger-specific
code?
Adam
___
webkit-dev
the
tools only work for Chromium.
- James
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Nikolas Zimmermann
zimmerm...@physik.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Am 08.10.2010 um 20:14 schrieb Jeremy Orlow:
I'm not an expert on Pixel tests, but my understanding is that in
Chromium (where we've always run with tolerance
I'm not an expert on Pixel tests, but my understanding is that in Chromium
(where we've always run with tolerance 0) we've seen real regressions that
would have slipped by with something like tolerance 0.1. When you have
0 tolerance, it is more maintenance work, but if we can avoid regressions,
This does seem like a great idea. The more pixel tests we can run on the
bots, the better!
J
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Dirk Schulze k...@webkit.org wrote:
I strongly support pixel tests for SVG on the bots! Niko and me are hard
working to get SVG pxiel perfect at all time. We run
Although this is a noble goal, wouldn't it require either
1) Us maintaining yet another build system or
2) Any Windows based WebKit hackers needing to upgrade their Visual
Studio...which would require $$? [1]
Either way, what's our migration plan (since we can't use VS 2005 forever)?
J
[1] Yes
Given that a ping really doesn't open up any new privacy holes (just makes
it easier for sites to get the data they're going to gather anyway without
slowing down the experience for the user), it seems like we might as well
enable it by default. If a port doesn't want it, they can always disable
They've also helped me on occasion. I get enough bug spam already that even
in the worst case, I don't find the notices all that obtrusive. More useful
messages would be nice though.
J
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Does anyone find the sheriffbot
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:32 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
We're not very good at using these fields in Bugzilla. In this
situation, folks will usually prefix the summary of the bug with
[Chromium]. This is
Recently in a code review for IndexedDB, I was told that I should be adding
every test individually to GTK's skip list. The reason cited was this
comment at the top # Also, no grouping should occur. Every test for
itself. For features like IndexedDB which are not turned on by a port, is
it still
I promise to only put IndexedDB tests in the indexeddb directory. :-)
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 5:50 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Recently in a code review for IndexedDB, I was told that I should be
adding every test individually
of a code, I
would have done it differently.)
Btw, I find it humorous that, by your own logic, you probably should have
sent your rebuke in a private email. :-)
J
dave
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I promise to only put IndexedDB tests in the indexeddb
Isn't ref counting supposed to be _really_ optimized for exactly this use?
It seems like a good match--unless you have major issues with
cycles...which might be the issue?
J
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
I would be happy to not add another Arena
Is this documented somewhere? It seems like it comes up every now and then
and can be quite frustrating. On the other hand, I really don't know where
makes sense to document it. :-)
Note that this is also what you do when needing to export something form
wtf.
J
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:37
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at
, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.comwrote:
On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:18 AM
this in the past.
Also, is there a reason why they're necessary?
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
You're talking about the module part of the IDL? Is that even used by
anything or specified anywhere? As far as I can tell, the answer is no.
On Tue
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Chinmaya Sn chinm...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks All. I think I am getting the general idea of what can get into
to WebKit and how things fit.
Right now both the standard and implementation are WIP, spec is intended to
be a Web standard. At this point, neither
The Kernel usually reserves 1/4 (but up to 3/4 on some OSes) of the address
space for itself + you can get fragmentation. So the linker only can use
part of the 4gb of ram in your machine. So switching to a 64 bit linker
would probably fix the problem for now. Another option is to disable some
In that case, can we please standardize on the Xcode 3 behavior and ask
those using the beta to keep it out manually?
J
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Jeff Johnson opendar...@lapcatsoftware.com
wrote:
Actually, this is caused by Xcode 4 (still in beta).
See rdar://problem/8295614 Xcode 4
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
On multiple occasions, I've been noticing that separating JavaScript for
tests into its own file has been causing me pain. There are several
disadvantages that I know of:
1. One doesn't see test content when a tool
Are there currently any plans for simplifying the situation regarding build
systems? I haven't seen any threads for a while, which I assume means no.
Is there any low hanging fruit out there? Since many of the build systems
are little more than lists of files, it really seems like we should be
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:18 AM, David Kilzer ddkil...@webkit.org wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Dumitru Daniliuc d...@chromium.org wrote:
i completely agree with jeremy. is it possible to at least drop the
cryptic hashcodes/timestamps? without them, the .xcodeproj files should at
on
the mac port) is out of hand--and has been for some time. And I'm hoping we
can come to some sort of conclusion that'll start the project moving in the
right direction--even if it's slowly. That's it. I promise!
J
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug
Impressive! Thanks Eric+Adam for all the work on this! You guys are quite
a team.
J
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
The HTML5 tree builder is enabled as of
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/64712. Check out our awesome
SVG-in-HTML demo (in a post r64712
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann
zimmerm...@physik.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Good morning WebKit crowd,
I'd like to discuss some style issues, that I'm frequently unsure about:
1. namespace closing brace
It was discussed in
This is not the right mailing list for such questions. Please see
http://webkit.org/contact.html
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Andrew Sealy-Bell
andyamsterdam2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if anybody has experience with rendering a PDF on an HTML5
canvas? I'd like to to this
Why wasn't it done that way originally? That sounds (to my uneducated ear)
much better than what's done today.
J
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
WebCore::LayoutTestController would be exposed to JavaScript running
in LayoutTests directly (like the DOM),
Seriously? It's the first result: http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=webkit-dev
Clearly you overly value your own time if you couldn't even do a quick
search on how to properly unsubscribe and instead spammed an entire mailing
list.
J
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Johnson, Christopher
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Originally, we had the commit-queue to land only if all the core
builders were green. One recent change we made to make the
commit-queue more agressive is to
I agree with Maciej's response, but at the same time I can understand why
Adam was so frustrated. He (and others) have pointed out stuff like this on
and off list over and over again with little apparent change...
But that's not what I'm most worried about; why this was broken in the tree
for 12
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
07.07.2010, в 9:49, Jeremy Orlow написал(а):
Why did not one of those people roll the patch out when it was clear that
there were failures and Alexey wasn't in the process of fixing them?
Just to avoid any
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Mo, Zhenyao zhen...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I should complain this in a different threads, but recently the
commit bot waiting time is
That would be the standard thing to do.
The sooner someone gets started on the feature, the easier it'll be to
revert the patch that removes the code. :-)
J
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter Kasting
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Mike Marchywka marchy...@hotmail.comwrote:
So where does this stand right now? I hope to actually contribute at some
point.
but right now I'm just trying to determine approaches to even finding the
problems.
( and yes my disk light still comes on for
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Mike Marchywka marchy...@hotmail.comwrote:
Unless you're actively working on this problem within WebKit, these
emails seem out of scope for webkit-dev.
The topic addresses this doesn't it? I would think that outlining a
development strategy would be
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Joe Mason wrote:
I'm strongly in favour of g_. It seems weird and ugly to me to have
prefixes for some non-local scopes but not all. And it's very helpful
to be able to look at a
The patch needs a champion who's willing to take the time to get it into
landable shape. This mainly means splitting it up into small bits for
review, cleaning up the code, and fixing problems brought up in review. It
will probably require a lot of work.
J
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:34 PM,
This will save me so many iterations of trying a name into gmail and then
copying it over to bugzilla. :-)
Thanks Ojan!
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Wow, that's pretty awesome. Thanks Ojan.
Adam
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ojan Vafai
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Jian Li wrote:
I am working on Blob.url support as defined in the latest version of File
API (http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/). The Blob.url will return a
URL that can be used to refer to
If you want to change the web platform (which adding information to events
is), sending an email to WhatWG [1] is probably the right first step.
The other option is to think about how to extend the existing developer
tools to aid in debugging. Personally, that makes more sense to me, and I
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
Lets say I just did webkit-patch
See the enable functions in WebCore/page/Settings.h.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Adam Thorsen adam.thor...@gmail.comwrote:
I've got a minimal browser app that is linked against the WebKit framework
that I'm building with XCode. I'm developing a website that uses some HTML5
local storage
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
One of the least fun things in the project is to pour a bunch of
effort into writing a patch only to see it sit forever waiting for
review. In the
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
We require a ChangeLog for every patch. Isn't that a TPS report?
No. A ChangeLog is much less time-consuming to manage.
For me, letting webkit-patch make the bug for me and post updates to the bug
is maybe 10-15
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
11.05.2010, в 0:56, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
I do think making it capable of handling subdirectories would be an
improvement for SVN users. Also, I suspect it doesn't work as well as it
could for people who
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
It seems to me a better model would be to regenerate the bindings test
file
automatically as part of the build. Then the changes can still be
Agreed. Can you give us a pointer to the email thread this decision was
made on?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.comwrote:
Hate to ask a dumb question, but why MD5? Isn't it on its last legs as
a secure hash? New protocols should be avoiding it.
On Tue, Apr
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 08 April 2010 09:24:32 pm Darin Adler wrote:
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Can someone please point to the bug report and the forum where this
development was discussed by the greater WebKit
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
On 08.04.2010, at 1:16, o...@webkit.org wrote:
+ // [Qt]r57240 broke Qt build (might be a gcc bug)
+ // FIXME! See: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37253
FIXME! is different from FIXME: in that Xcode
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Patrick Roland Gansterer par...@paroga.com
wrote:
Hi,
i had the same problem some months ago
(https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2010-January/011160.html),
but
didn't get any final reply.
I had a look onto other (meta) buildsystems, but most of
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
It seems as though we should at very least change the main icon on
webkit.org to match what is apparently the official webkit logo. The
icons for the Mac and Windows
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Kenneth Christiansen
kenneth.christian...@openbossa.org wrote:
I have asked our designers to look into it :-)
Kenneth
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Darin
And does anyone know where the original artwork is and/or came from?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
It seems as though we should at very least change the main icon on
webkit.org to match what is apparently the official webkit logo. The
icons
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
Would you happen to know how WebKit icon is licensed?
The icon currently on webkit.org has the icon for Apple’s Safari web
browser in it. Because of that, Apple has
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Zoltan Herczeg zherc...@inf.u-szeged.huwrote:
Hi,
It's also a big help when peers (which aren't necessarily WebKit
reviewers)
look over it and give review-style feedback as well. Especially when
said
peers know more about that code than any of the
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 07:06:16 am Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I can give you a success story though: michaeln is probably the most
qualified reviewer of WebSQLDatabase code these days. He looks at most
patches that go by, and I
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Mozilla has been using this technique for years. Perhaps we can pick their
brains for some good tricks. Or, dare I say it, share some tests.
Hi, hope I'm not crashing the party, and sorry I'm late :-). Let me just
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:39 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
(3) Someone reviewed an earlier version of the patch but then didn't
follow up. I think having a partial review by one person encourages
other people to assume that person will finish the review. That cause
the patch to
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
But any regressions would have been blamed on eric.
His name would show up in the SVN log, sure, but I don't think that'd fool
your average WebKit developer for long.
webkit-patch land does the correct thing, but i disable
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Not to point fingers, but we've been having trouble keeping
build.webkit.org green these past few weeks. As I write this message,
every platform is broken, again. As the project scales, polluting the
build with brokenness
Personally, I've found those kind of changes are responsible for
a disproportionate percentage of build errors and bugs. :-)
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 1:42 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Did you run the layout tests at all?
Oliver
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
The bots take 15 minutes to cycle. The moment the build is broken,
thats FIX_TIME + BOT_CYCLE_TIME until their green again.
I think we should
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
On 26.02.2010, at 9:29, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I'd like it if we had an IRC bot that announced build breakage on
#webkit.
Perhaps better yet, on
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
Mozilla has (or at least had when I worked there) two additional tree
rules that helped keep the tree green:
1. A sheriff was appointed at all times, and had the
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
Mozilla has (or at least had when I worked there) two additional tree
rules that helped keep
The only time I've ever had an issue with committing is when I forgot to add
the file myself. The bot uses the same scripts that committers do. I think
it'd be worth your time to become comfortable with them. If nothing else,
so you can land fixes for when you break the build. It also frees up
The only time I've ever had an issue with committing is when I forgot to add
the file myself. The bot uses the same scripts that committers do. I think
it'd be worth your time to become comfortable with them. If nothing else,
so you can land fixes for when you break the build. It also frees up
Done.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I already started the process of doing a revert and submitting it with a
better change log.
J
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.orgwrote:
On 25.02.2010, at 10:00, David Levin
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
On 22.02.2010, at 15:16, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
My bet is I've failed to add
something critical to the bindings, some override for the
idl-generated code that wasn't needed in the DOM bindings but is for
the Worker
This mailing list is not the proper place for such a question. This is for
WebKit development related email only.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vishwesh Jirgale vishwesh.gro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello All,
Is there a page/blog where all the features of Android's webkit browser are
listed
Hm. Now that I look closer, I think the only actual conflict is in the
Database interface. It still seemed worth the webapps email though.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote
(I had forgotten that many of the sql interfaces are prefixed by SQL. So
IndexedDB's Transaction interface doesn't actually conflict because SQL's is
named SQLTransaction.)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Hm. Now that I look closer, I think the only
A couple of us at Google are starting to look at implementing the IndexedDB
API [1] in WebKit. We thought a good first step would be to create the IDL
files. The first thing I noticed is that it and the Web SQL Database API
[2] have quite a few conflicts in terms of their interface names. I'm
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Alex Milowski a...@milowski.org wrote:
I've create a new patch that contains all the current code that I have
on MathML at:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33703
I don't expect anyone to review this patch (unless they want to do so).
Since
I
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Plan 3 seems like the best (and simplest) one until the infrastructure for
the others (and/or a champion for fixing currently failing tests) is
available.
What would it take to go with plan 3? I guess someone needs
the patch.
:DG
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
Plan 3 seems like the best (and simplest) one until
the infrastructure for
the others (and/or a champion for fixing currently
Plan 3 seems like the best (and simplest) one until the infrastructure for
the others (and/or a champion for fixing currently failing tests) is
available.
What would it take to go with plan 3? I guess someone needs to rebaseline
everything that's currently failing, check them in, and then
(Oops, I meant to post this before the holidays but completely forgot.
Better late than never I suppose?)
A couple weeks ago, Eric Seidel gave a tech talk to a live studio audience
of Googlers on the guts of webkit. Although there are a few bits that only
apply to Chromium, the vast majority of
in my talk, I'd love to know about them.
-eric
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
(Oops, I meant to post this before the holidays but completely forgot.
Better late than never I suppose?)
A couple weeks ago, Eric Seidel gave a tech talk to a live
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
