I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those QMake files. My sense is
that it would not be trivial by any means.
Plus, I don't like the idea of a meta-meta generators. Seems way to mickey-
mouse to me.
Adam
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam Treat:
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator
that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those QMake files.
My sense is
that it would not be trivial by any means.
Plus, I don't like the idea of a meta-meta
Hi Peter,
On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Anyway, my $0.02 is that, in terms of immediate bang for the buck, we're
probably better off trying to synchronize the build systems automatically in
Hi All
The default implementation of JS Date is calling currentTime() (by
jsCurrentTime()), so it assumes currentTime() returns current UTC time, and
system UTC time can be changed. However, currentTime() is also used in most
cases as a system tick count, which means it should always be
Hi Nikolas,
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam Treat:
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those QMake files. My sense
is
that it would not be
This seems like just a more restricted version of gyp to me. And one that
isn't sufficiently powerful, e.g., what if a platform decides to disable SVG
and doesn't want to compile SVG files? You end up adding some sort of syntax
for that. In the end, you have something that's 90% of the way to a
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.comwrote:
Perhaps, but in any case, I think the first step there is for the Gyp
developers to try implementing support and see how it goes. However, from
that perspective, until Gyp has support for those formats, isn't a
Please guys,
No need to speculate here on what I proposed at the session since Evan
somehow left some details out and let me reinforce some points. For those
who missed the session, please understand that what's Peter said isn't
exactly what we agreed on.
Here's some data points:
- No plan to
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Luiz Agostini
luiz.agost...@openbossa.org wrote:
2010/4/15 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
Hello all,
I'm part of the EFL port team and we're implementing the PopupMenu,
however EFL is a different platform as for our port it is just a
2010/4/16 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Luiz Agostini
luiz.agost...@openbossa.org wrote:
2010/4/15 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
Hello all,
I'm part of the EFL port team and we're implementing the PopupMenu,
Am 16.04.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Ojan Vafai:
This seems like just a more restricted version of gyp to me. And one
that isn't sufficiently powerful, e.g., what if a platform decides
to disable SVG and doesn't want to compile SVG files? You end up
adding some sort of syntax for that. In the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Luiz Agostini
luiz.agost...@openbossa.org wrote:
2010/4/16 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Luiz Agostini
luiz.agost...@openbossa.org wrote:
2010/4/15 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
bike-shedding
I think 80 columns is a waste of time and hurts readability.
Instead of being smart about when we wrap code, 80 adheres to a
blanket rule, discourages long variable/function names, and needlessly
expands code vertically ignoring modern wider-than-long monitors.
The optparse code
Am 16.04.2010 um 19:14 schrieb Marc-Antoine Ruel:
Please guys,
No need to speculate here on what I proposed at the session since
Evan somehow left some details out and let me reinforce some points.
For those who missed the session, please understand that what's
Peter said isn't exactly
On Friday 16 April 2010 05:10:25 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Hi,
Adam Treat (tr...@kde.org) suggested that I join this list to talk about
CMake as an option for a unified cross platform build solution. My name
is Bill Hoffman. I am the lead CMake developer. My company Kitware
created and
I don't see this as a decision needing pre-approval.
This is a decision needing code. No one has tried to make Mac, Win,
or other ports use a common system yet. Obviously converting them in
the end requires buy-in from those ports. But producing a demo
doesn't/shouldn't.
I eventually plan to
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk/CMakeLists.txt?rev=17853
Cheers,
Adam
On Friday 16 April 2010 05:34:45 pm Eric Seidel wrote:
I don't see this
On Apr 16, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
bike-shedding
I think 80 columns is a waste of time and hurts readability.
Instead of being smart about when we wrap code, 80 adheres to a
blanket rule, discourages long variable/function names, and needlessly
expands code vertically ignoring
(I have contributed but not often.) I also agree with 80 columns hurts
readability.
It doesn't take much looking to show a
lothttp://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebKitTools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/run_webkit_tests.py#L135of
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it
easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk/CMakeLists.txt?rev=17853
Can CMake generate native Xcode
On Friday 16 April 2010 06:21:39 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it
easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam Treat:
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator
that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those QMake files.
My sense is
that it would not be trivial by
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I'm curious if the Chromium folks who created Gyp had any specific reason
that they ruled out CMake as an option. (I have heard that it was considered
and rejected.)
CCing a couple people involved if they wish to
I think having longer lines of code hurts readability. There is lots
of typographic evidence
to back this up ( e.g.
http://webtypography.net/Rhythm_and_Proportion/Horizontal_Motion/2.1.2/.
Of
course, the typographic commentary applies to text rather than code,
and most text isn't indented,
but I
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I'm curious if the Chromium folks who created Gyp had any specific reason
that they ruled out CMake as an option. (I have heard that it was
On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
I'm curious if the Chromium folks who created Gyp had any specific
reason
that they ruled
This is from an earlier thread on this issue on webkit-dev:
We also considered CMake, and had it demonstrably working for some of
our smaller projects as well. Unfortunately, transitioning to CMake
would have required moving everything over at once, without allowing
for some existing projects
2010/4/16 Nikolas Zimmermann zimmerm...@physik.rwth-aachen.de
Am 16.04.2010 um 19:14 schrieb Marc-Antoine Ruel:
Please guys,
No need to speculate here on what I proposed at the session since Evan
somehow left some details out and let me reinforce some points. For those
who missed the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
FWIW, I don't have CMake installed, and I have everything a typical Apple
developer would have and then some. I'm running SnowLeopard and the latest
Xcode. CMake is also not installed by default on Windows and I am not
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Nico Weber tha...@chromium.org wrote:
This is from an earlier thread on this issue on webkit-dev:
We also considered CMake, and had it demonstrably working for some of
our smaller projects as well. Unfortunately, transitioning to CMake
would have required
On Friday 16 April 2010 09:58:17 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Also: how hard is the dependency on being installed? Is this a solvable
problem if it turns out to be a showstopper for some folks?
It has to be installed, if this is a show stopper, then it is a show
stopper.
To be clear, it just
Thanks Nico for digging up the archive.
As I said in the other thread, the people at the session mostly looked about
reducing the number of build system, not forcing anyone to use any tool. If
some teams wants to switch to CMake, prefect as long as the number of build
tool reduces. Nobody seemed
We can make binaries available through a convenient download script
(possibly one that gets a source drop and builds it) if we have to. In fact,
when WebKit first switched to Subversion, for a while you had to get your
own copy to even check out the tree.
Sounds good.
All I'm saying is
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2010 09:58:17 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Also: how hard is the dependency on being installed? Is this a solvable
problem if it turns out to be a showstopper for some folks?
It has to be installed, if this is a
On Apr 16, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
wrote:
Thanks Nico for digging up the archive.
As I said in the other thread, the people at the session mostly
looked about
reducing the number of build system, not
Calling cmake during the build would likely be a showstopper for the Mac
port. As far as I know, Apple's build farm does not have CMake installed (at
least not on older build trains). And it's not easy to convince the build
engineers to install custom build tools.
I am told they have it now
Am 16.04.2010 um 18:14 schrieb Kevin Ollivier:
Hi Nikolas,
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam Treat:
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator
that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those
37 matches
Mail list logo
