Re: [webkit-dev] [webkit-changes] [52125] trunk/LayoutTests

2009-12-14 Thread Adam Roben
For predictable failures like these, Darin Adler says the best thing to do is 
land the expected failure as an expected result, and use a bug to track the 
fact that it’s wrong. [1] But maybe in the case of tests that time out, it's 
best to skip them in order to keep the regression tests from slowing down?

-Adam

1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.opendarwin.webkit.devel/10002/focus=10017

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] [webkit-changes] [52125] trunk/LayoutTests

2009-12-14 Thread Eric Seidel
For anyone else who went digging for the link:
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/52125 :)

-eric

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
 For predictable failures like these, Darin Adler says the best thing to do is 
 land the expected failure as an expected result, and use a bug to track the 
 fact that it’s wrong. [1] But maybe in the case of tests that time out, it's 
 best to skip them in order to keep the regression tests from slowing down?

 -Adam

 1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.opendarwin.webkit.devel/10002/focus=10017

 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev