Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-04-07 04:02:
Do you mean that no German site use Google Analytics because of privacy
issues in German Law? I think this is a bit of an exageration.
Christian is right. Google Analytics is a serious problem, because of
exporting European data to third-party US
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 13:32 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-04-07 04:02:
Do you mean that no German site use Google Analytics because of privacy
issues in German Law? I think this is a bit of an exageration.
Christian is right. Google Analytics is a
Hi,
Am 07.04.2012 13:32, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-04-07 04:02:
Do you mean that no German site use Google Analytics because of privacy
issues in German Law? I think this is a bit of an exageration.
Christian is right. Google Analytics is a serious problem,
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 16:30 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Anton Meixome meix...@certima.net wrote:
Me too.
I have intent for use the snip from Google analytics (pasted in metadata)
Webmasters/the board doesn't want google analytics. The server is
Hi Drew,
drew jensen wrote on 2012-04-07 14:03:
The decision not to use Google is certainly one which falls within the
group here, and I would not disagree with the decision not to use it,
but there is no basis at this point, IMO, to continue spreading the idea
that it is a violation of German
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:14 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Drew,
drew jensen wrote on 2012-04-07 14:03:
The decision not to use Google is certainly one which falls within the
group here, and I would not disagree with the decision not to use it,
but there is no basis at this
Hi,
drew jensen wrote on 2012-04-07 15:28:
I want to be clear that I'm not advocating using GA on the site, I think
the use of the in-house tool is the correct choice here.
no worries - thanks for clearing up the legal issue, I indeed was wrong
here and not up to date. :-)
But, I agree, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian
Em 05-04-2012 11:30, Christian Lohmaier escreveu:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Anton Meixome meix...@certima.net wrote:
Me too.
I have intent for use the snip from Google analytics (pasted in metadata)
Webmasters/the board
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Anton Meixome meix...@certima.net wrote:
Me too.
I have intent for use the snip from Google analytics (pasted in metadata)
Webmasters/the board doesn't want google analytics. The server is
hosted in germany, thus german law applies and that is rather picky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anton
Have you been sucessfull to use Google javascript snippet into Galician
LO silverstripe? If affirmative, can you tell me how did you do? AFAIk
there is no room for custom scripts in SS pages.
Thanks
Em 28-03-2012 17:12, Anton Meixome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anton, web admins,
Em 03-04-2012 14:10, Anton Meixome escreveu:
Even the code is in the head, I think is not functional. I include it
in box Custom Meta Tags. The source code of the page show it.
That is what I thought: inside meta tags, it
From my working with google analytics i have always put that script in
between the body tags
You can find out more information here
http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingOverview.html
HTH
Jonathan
On 03/04/2012 19:23, Olivier Hallot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
I forgot to add that that script has to be on EVERY SINGLE PAGE in
between the body tags.
On 03/04/2012 19:23, Olivier Hallot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anton, web admins,
Em 03-04-2012 14:10, Anton Meixome escreveu:
Even the code is in the head, I think is not
2012/4/3 Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com:
From my working with google analytics i have always put that script in
between the body tags
You can find out more information here
http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingOverview.html
HTH
Jonathan
Yes, but there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jonathan
AFAIK, under SilverStripe CMS, scripts are stripped from body tags, even
if you use the html editor.
Regards
Olivier
Em 03-04-2012 14:25, Jonathan Aquilina escreveu:
From my working with google analytics i have always put that
I would file a request upstream with silverstripe as that is a bug in
the system IMHO if one wants to use google analytics how can they though
if such scripts are stripped. Could it possibly be a setting in SS that
needs to be adjusted to allow said scripts?
On 03/04/2012 19:39, Olivier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I googled this:
http://zool.in.ua/home-en-US/silverstripe-custom-code-head-insertion/
But it is @ webadmins level, since it must be inserted into the php.
Regards
Olivier
Em 03-04-2012 14:41, Jonathan Aquilina escreveu:
I would file a
If there is a module that takes care of the Google analytics how come its not
being used. I use one on my wordpress website and it takes the need out of
having to add the java script to each page manually.
I think it would be beneficial both to the groups and the TDF as a whole
in regards to
I am not sure if you saw Alex's previous email it seems like there is a
module for SS which might be something worth looking into and possibly
using.
On 03/04/2012 19:49, Olivier Hallot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I googled this:
Me too.
I have intent for use the snip from Google analytics (pasted in metadata)
It's important for Galician marketing because our mirror is not a good
reference (downloads went for any language and sistem).
2012/3/28 Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org:
-BEGIN PGP
20 matches
Mail list logo
