I'd certainly take no offence if a reST one is used :) That little wiki I
whacked together is admitedly a little messy and probably useless without
the auth the rest of my software provides. :) Whats the PyDiddy port like?
--
Shayne O'Neill
http://perth.indymedia.org
I know how hard it is for
Hallo,
Chuck Esterbrook hat gesagt: // Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 07:49:47 +1000, Oliver Bock wrote:
The most difficult part of the installation was stripping WebWare
down to fit in 10MB with the rest of my things. (It would be nice
to have a doc-free and perhaps
Hallo,
Shayne ONeill hat gesagt: // Shayne ONeill wrote:
I'd certainly take no offence if a reST one is used :) That little wiki I
whacked together is admitedly a little messy and probably useless without
the auth the rest of my software provides. :) Whats the PyDiddy port like?
PyDiddy is my
Hallo,
Ian Bicking hat gesagt: // Ian Bicking wrote:
In my limited testing, the C adapter (wkcgi) was as fast (faster?) than
the mod_python adapter (which admittedly is a pretty silly adapter).
Though it's been a long time since I checked, so my memory is unclear.
mod_webkit was a bit
For those of you not familiar with the latest MoinMoin release, version
1.2.1 has been restructured and now runs under Twisted, FastCGI, and
ModPython.
The Twisted specific code is pretty small. I have intentions of taking
a stab at trying to get MoinMoin to run under Webware, but I don't have
It just struck me that whereas the php people fall over themselves to
build a million and one yet another groupware package thingees, the
webware folks fall over each other to make wiki's.
This tells me a lot of positive things about the psychology round here!
Nice :)
--
Shayne O'Neill
Ian Bicking wrote:
Terrel Shumway wrote:
If it doesn't, a WebKit instance per-user does not sound appealing.
Instance-per-user is not a problem unless you want to host 50+ users on
one box. But dedicated servers are cheap enough that you shouldn't need
to put more than 10 webware users (max) on
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Thanks for this info. In my applications, the adapter surely isn't the
bottleneck so I'll just stay with the C one at least until I find the
time to read the mod_webkit docs. ;)
Behold, the most concise and marvelous mod_webkit docs:
1) edit makefile to point APXS to
Shayne ONeill wrote:
It just struck me that whereas the php people fall over themselves to
build a million and one yet another groupware package thingees, the
webware folks fall over each other to make wiki's.
Call it the hello world effect. New scheme programmers MUST write a
fibonacci or
OK, the repository is more-or-less set up, now waiting for someone to
use it. You can check it out in all its empty glory:
svn co svn://w4py.org
I don't know what we'll put in there. Thoughts? The only contents are
a document which outlines how the repository can be used (still open
for
10 matches
Mail list logo
