It looks like the customer and it's related items are being set as
*class* variables instead of *instance* attributes.
Class variables will be shared across all instances. All of the code
in the various page methods are manipulating the same variable in the
class. You're going to have to
Hi Matt,
Thanks for taking the time and effort to reply (and quickly!) and for
your helpful comments. It is very useful to know that the reason that
there aren't many bug fixes is that there aren't many bugs.
Considering that there aren't many bugs and that it is stable, would
it be logical,
I'll add my 2cents because my useage perspective is slightly different
from most. I recently (2+ months ago) accepted my current position as
software architect and I kinda recieved ownership of a web architecture
that utilizes Webware. So I didn't get to really choose to use it.
However, I've
Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I know
that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is not yet,
so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
I'm glad that you're
lloyd wrote:
i'm using webware in a project for the first time. maybe it's
irrational, but i feel more comfortable using a release than the latest
snapshot.
on the other hand, i'd like to explore the use of middlekit, but
postgresql support (which i need) is only in cvs.
I think MiddleKit
I just caught up with this thread, I've seen a lot of the locking
problems with a small Webware app I wrote a few months ago. I never
questioned the Operating System (Fedora Core 1, I'm not 100% sure of
the kernel, I know it's 2.4, but I'm not sure which rev beyond that).
The app accesses a
Have you tried using:
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19
See
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06849.h
tml
- Geoff
Chris McAvoy wrote:
I just caught up with this thread, I've seen a lot of the locking
problems with a small Webware app I wrote a few months ago. I never
questioned
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I
know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is
not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
I haven't, but I will.
Chris
Original Message Follows
From: Geoffrey Talvola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: webware-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Webware-discuss] WebKit thread deaths cause found?
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:24:04 -0400
Have you tried using:
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19
Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
The time is way overdue for a new release from
the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps
forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently seems to
have the time or inclination to do it.
what is required?
ps - is the traffic on
On Oct 28, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I
know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is
not yet,
All --
My opinion only, and it may also fly like a stone chicken, but here
goes.
In the *nix world, unlike Windoz, version 1.0 and up does not have the
it finally legitimate meaning so many have come to expect.
I have been using Webware for some time now, all be it for a low tech,
low usage
12 matches
Mail list logo
