On Oct 28, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
Matt Feifarek wrote:[snip]Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
I think Webware needs an automated test suite and better documentation in
order to be considered 1.0. The time is way overdue for a new release from
the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps
forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently seems to
have the time or inclination to do it.
- Geoff
A fool rushes in...
The automated test suite must surely be a critical path item for a 1.0 release but perhaps a current release (0.8.2?) is more useful in the short term. I have a few days between projects starting next week and I am willing to put in the time to create a new release provided a seasoned resource (or two) volunteers to deal with the clueless questions I am certain to have. I am quite new to the CVS. However, I am getting the hang of it insofar as updating webware projects with current snapshots and I have read the cederqvist document.
BTW, I will not be offended if this offer flies like a stone chicken. I am sure there are others on this list far better qualified than I.
- Mark Phillips
-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
