Re: Feedback feature request

2002-04-22 Thread Scott . Simpson
Thanks for the pointer. It looks like a good product, but unfortunately not what I'm after. I really need it to have no dependencies under win32, like wget, so I can just drop the exe in and make it go. Scott Alan E [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/04/2002 17:06 To: [EMAIL

RE: Feedback feature request

2002-04-22 Thread Herold Heiko
Maybe you didn't know there are (at least two) ways to compile perl on w32 to a independant executable: perl2exe and a tool made by Activestate. Both are commercial. Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021

spaces in file names

2002-04-22 Thread Jamie Zawinski
When a URL path component contains a space, is wget supposed to create a file with a space in it, or not? Regardless of the answer to that question, I can't imagine how the following behavior could be correct: --04:40:07--

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jamie Zawinski wrote: I know this would be somewhat evil, but can we have a special case in wget to assume that files named ?N=D and index.html?N=D are the same as index.html? I'm tired of those dumb apache sorting directives showing up in my mirrors as if they were

Re: Validating cookie domains

2002-04-22 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Ian Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I realized it was stupid after I posted it (I was about to leave!) when I remembered cc domains like .de don't need an extra period. I thought maybe a table of exceptions would sort that out The problem is that new domains appear all the times, and

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jamie Zawinski wrote: I know this would be somewhat evil, but can we have a special case in wget to assume that files named ?N=D and index.html?N=D are the same as index.html? I'm tired of those dumb apache sorting directives

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: How about using the -R option of wget? A brief test proves -R '*\?[A-Z]=[A-Z]' works as it should. Or maybe the default system wgetrc should ship with something like: reject = *?[A-Z]=[A-Z] Note the difference between strings! -- the

ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting.

2002-04-22 Thread System Attendant
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please refer to the contents of this message for further details. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Subject = CELLSPACING Scanning Time = 04/22/2002 18:06:07 Engine/Pattern = 6.150-1001/267 Action on

ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting.

2002-04-22 Thread System Attendant
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please refer to the contents of this message for further details. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Subject = How are you Scanning Time = 04/22/2002 18:07:56 Engine/Pattern = 6.150-1001/267 Action on

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread csaba . raduly
On 22/04/2002 16:38:15 Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: How about using the -R option of wget? A brief test proves -R '*\?[A-Z]=[A-Z]' works as it should. Or maybe the default system wgetrc should ship with something like: reject = *?[A-Z]=[A-Z]

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: reject = *?[A-Z]=[A-Z] Note the difference between strings! -- the backslash before the quotation mark is essential as otherwise it's a glob character. [A-Z] is a bit extreme, IMHO. How about reject = *\?[NMSD]=[AD] Hmm, it's too fragile

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Tony Lewis
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: Hmm, it's too fragile in my opinion. What if a new version of Apache defines a new format? I think all of the expressions proposed thus far are too fragile. Consider the following URL: http://www.google.com/search?num=100q=%2Bwget+-GNU The regular expression needs

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Tony Lewis wrote: I think all of the expressions proposed thus far are too fragile. Consider the following URL: http://www.google.com/search?num=100q=%2Bwget+-GNU The regular expression needs to account for multiple arguments separated by ampersands. It also needs

segmentation fault on bad url

2002-04-22 Thread Renaud Saliou
Hi, wget -t 3 -d -r -l 3 -H --random-wait -nd --delete-after -A.jpg,.gif,.zip,.png,.pdf http://http://www.microsoft.com DEBUG output created by Wget 1.8.1 on linux-gnu. zsh: segmentation fault wget -t 3 -d -r -l 3 -H --random-wait -nd --delete-after And that's all. -- SALIOU Renaud

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Tony Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: Hmm, it's too fragile in my opinion. What if a new version of Apache defines a new format? I think all of the expressions proposed thus far are too fragile. Consider the following URL:

Re: apache irritations

2002-04-22 Thread Tony Lewis
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: I'm not sure what you are referring to. We are discussing a common problem with static pages generated by default by Apache as index.html objects for server's filesystem directories providing no default page. Really? The original posting from Jamie Zawinski said:

Wget in Windows Filename Saving Problem

2002-04-22 Thread Jeff Creamer
To whom it may concern: Wget works great except for if you follow a site that has ? in the URL for querystring, Windows cannot save a filename with a ? in the filename. What can we do to correct this problem? Jeff

Re: RFE:add tar option

2002-04-22 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Max Waterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Someone (rudely) suggested it was unacceptable to ask for a 'cc' rather than joining the email list. That is not the case -- it is perfectly acceptable to post a question and ask for `Cc'. Especially so when you're posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED], an