--
-- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it
-- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- +39-041-5907073 ph
-- +39-041-5907472 fax
20031119.diff
Description: Binary data
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached a little patch needed for current cvs in order to compile
on windows nt 4 (any system without IPV6 really).
Thanks. Note that the function isn't even called when IPv6 is
unavailable, so you can feel free to wrap the entire function in
#ifdef
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Attached a little patch needed for current cvs in order to compile on
windows nt 4 (any system without IPV6 really).
FYI, Wget/IPv6 on Windows do work somewhat; getaddrinfo()
is able to resolve a host to it's IPv6 address(es). But getnameinfo()
isn't able
Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Due to lack of inet_ntop() on Windows, I used this instead:
struct sockaddr_in6 addr6;
addr6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
memcpy (addr6.sin6_addr, address, sizeof(addr6.sin6_addr));
if (getnameinfo ((const struct sockaddr*)addr6, sizeof(addr6),
but Wget doesn't check return value of inet_ntop(). Hint hint.
I wasn't aware that inet_ntop could really fail. Why did getaddrinfo
return the address if I can't print it?
getaddrinfo() on Win-XP seems to be a thin wrapper over the DNS
client which resolves records fine. But
Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but Wget doesn't check return value of inet_ntop(). Hint hint.
I wasn't aware that inet_ntop could really fail. Why did
getaddrinfo return the address if I can't print it?
getaddrinfo() on Win-XP seems to be a thin wrapper over the DNS
client which
Does anyone know whether the MSG_PEEK flag can be relied upon? I'd
like to use peeking to get rid of the ad hoc rbuf layer used in Wget
since time immemorial.
Peeking would require additional work under SSL, but I think I know
how to make it work. But I'm more worried about TCP/IP stacks that
hello.
i have run into a problem while using wget: when viewing a web page with
html like this:
a href=images/IMG_01
.jpgimg src=images/tnIMG_01
.jpg/a
browsers (i tested with mozilla and IE) can handle the line breaks in
the urls (presumably stripping them out), but wget chokes on
That is _really_ ugly, and perhaps immoral. Make it an option, if you must.
Certainly don't make it the default behavior.
Shudder
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:59 PM
To: Peter GILMAN
Cc: [EMAIL
